国际论坛2025，Vol.27Issue(1)：96-116,21.DOI:10.13549/j.cnki.cn11-3959/d.2025.01.006
人道主义介入的关系治理路径与"建设性介入"
Relational Governance Path of Humanitarian Involvement and"Constructive Engagement":A Case Study of China's Engagement in Resolving the Myanmar Crisis
摘要
Abstract
Since the post-Cold War era,humanitarian involvement has been a significant global political phenomenon that has generated debate on both a philosophical and practical level.With China's beginning to engage actively in regional humanitarian crises,an important strategic question has emerged:how to explain the theoretical distinctions between Chinese and Western modes of humanitarian involvement,as well as how to define the Chinese model more clearly.By analyzing humanitarian involvement concepts and comparing practices in China and the West,this paper concludes that the Western model and China's"constructive engagement"represent two distinct governance paths:rule-based governance and relational governance.The former exceeds its authority and violates the principle of sovereignty,whereas the latter benefits the country at issue by respecting its sovereignty.To understand the meaning and logic of"constructive engagement,"this study develops an analytical framework of relational governance and illustrates it with the example of China's"constructive engagement"in Myanmar.According to the paperwork,China's"constructive engagement"in Myanmar is motivated primarily by safeguarding co-interest.China's approach is conductive to promoting the building of trust among all parties in Myanmar.Furthermore,China is committed to the principle of comfort and works to create long-term favorable conditions for resolving the situation.As an extension and innovation of the paradigm of international humanitarian involvement,"constructive engagement"proposes a more acceptable and feasible solution to global human rights governance.关键词
人道主义介入/关系治理/"建设性介入"/缅甸问题Key words
humanitarian involvement/relational governance/"constructive engagement"/Myanmar crisis分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
王传剑,刘晓健..人道主义介入的关系治理路径与"建设性介入"[J].国际论坛,2025,27(1):96-116,21.基金项目
本文系2023年国家社会科学基金重点项目"域外大国介入南海问题的态势、影响和对策研究"(项目批准号:23AGJ004)的阶段性成果. （项目批准号:23AGJ004）
