对"用能权"权利性质的几点质疑OA
Questions on the Nature of"Energy Consuming Right":Also on Its Legal Obligation Essence
"用能权"在实践和理论上被普遍认为是一项权利.这种认识受经济学、伦理学等学科与环境法学盲目交叉的影响,反映了对权利与市场路径的依赖,不仅造成法定权利的泛化和失序,也无法有效实现能源总量和强度"双控"目标.从"用能权"的起源、内涵、作用机制来看,其真实面貌是政府总量控制下的用能单位所负能效义务.以法律义务为重心考察"用能权"制度,可以充分衔接环境法律体系,理顺法律关系,确保能源总量和强度"双控"目标的实现.同时,应防止将"用能权"过度公权化,有必要…查看全部>>
"Energy consuming right"is generally recognized as a legal right in both practice and theory.This perception is influenced by the blind intersection of disciplines such as economics,ethics and environmental laws,reflecting the path dependence on rights and markets,which not only causes the generalization and disorder of legal rights,but also fails to effectively achieve the"dual control"goals of total energy consumption and energy intensity reduction.From th…查看全部>>
刘卫先;侯善钦
中国海洋大学 法学院,山东 青岛 266100中国海洋大学 法学院,山东 青岛 266100
政治法律
"用能权"法律权利法律义务配额
"energy consuming right"legal rightslegal obligationsquotas
《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》 2025 (1)
47-55,9
评论