临床骨科杂志2025,Vol.28Issue(1):109-112,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2025.01.035
两种内固定方式治疗胫骨干骨折的疗效比较
Efficacy comparison of two types of internal fixation methods for treatment of tibial shaft fractures
卢耀开 1王锡雄 1蓝玮 1蓝声远 1符毅 1吴强初1
作者信息
- 1. 钦州市第一人民医院(广西医科大学第十附属医院)创伤骨科手外科,广西 钦州 535000
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy of bridging combined internal fixation system and interlocking intr-amedullary nailing fixation in treament of tibial shaft fracture.Methods The 79 patients with tibial shaft fractures were divided into control group(40 cases were adopted with interlocking intramedullary nailing fixation)and observa-tion group(39 cases were treated with interlocking bridging combined internal fixation system)according to different internal fixation.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,incidence of the wound infection,fracture healing time were recorded,and affected limb function was evaluated by using Johner-Wruhs score criterion.Results All patients were followed up for 12~35 months.There were no statistical differences in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,wound infection incidence rate,fracture healing time and the excellent-good rate of the affected limb function(P>0.05).Conclusions In the treatment of tibial shaft fractures,the bridging combined internal fixation system can a-chieve similar clinical effects to interlocking intramedullary nailing fixation.The surgeon can choose the appropriate internal fixation method according to the soft tissue conditions,fracture characteristics and personal experience.关键词
桥接组合式内固定系统/髓内钉/胫骨干骨折/内固定Key words
bridging combined internal fixation system/intramedullary nailing/tibial shaft fractures/internal fixation分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
卢耀开,王锡雄,蓝玮,蓝声远,符毅,吴强初..两种内固定方式治疗胫骨干骨折的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2025,28(1):109-112,4.