| 注册
首页|期刊导航|器官移植|比较多种机器学习模型预测肺移植术后受者生存

比较多种机器学习模型预测肺移植术后受者生存

史灵芝 陈静瑜 刘亚灵 严浩吉 喻赠玮 侯森林 刘明昭 杨航 吴波 田东

器官移植2025,Vol.16Issue(2):264-271,8.
器官移植2025,Vol.16Issue(2):264-271,8.DOI:10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025018

比较多种机器学习模型预测肺移植术后受者生存

Comparison of multiple machine learning models for predicting the survival of recipients after lung transplantation

史灵芝 1陈静瑜 2刘亚灵 3严浩吉 3喻赠玮 3侯森林 3刘明昭 1杨航 1吴波 1田东4

作者信息

  • 1. 214000 江苏无锡,南京医科大学无锡医学中心无锡市人民医院南京医科大学附属无锡市人民医院肺移植中心
  • 2. 214000 江苏无锡,南京医科大学无锡医学中心无锡市人民医院南京医科大学附属无锡市人民医院肺移植中心||浙江大学医学院附属第二医院肺移植科
  • 3. 四川大学华西医院胸部肿瘤研究所肺移植研究室
  • 4. 四川大学华西医院胸外科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the performance and efficacy of prognostic models constructed by different machine learning algorithms in predicting the survival period of lung transplantation(LTx)recipients.Methods Data from 483 recipients who underwent LTx were retrospectively collected.All recipients were divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3.The 24 collected variables were screened based on variable importance(VIMP).Prognostic models were constructed using random survival forest(RSF)and extreme gradient boosting tree(XGBoost).The performance of the models was evaluated using the integrated area under the curve(iAUC)and time-dependent area under the curve(tAUC).Results There were no significant statistical differences in the variables between the training set and the validation set.The top 15 variables ranked by VIMP were used for modeling and the length of stay in the intensive care unit(ICU)was determined as the most important factor.Compared with the XGBoost model,the RSF model demonstrated better performance in predicting the survival period of recipients(iAUC 0.773 vs.0.723).The RSF model also showed better performance in predicting the 6-month survival period(tAUC 6 months 0.884 vs.0.809,P=0.009)and 1-year survival period(tAUC 1 year 0.896 vs.0.825,P=0.013)of recipients.Based on the prediction cut-off values of the two algorithms,LTx recipients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups.The survival analysis results of both models showed that the survival rate of recipients in the high-risk group was significantly lower than that in the low-risk group(P<0.001).Conclusions Compared with XGBoost,the machine learning prognostic model developed based on the RSF algorithm may preferably predict the survival period of LTx recipients.

关键词

肺移植/机器学习/预测模型/随机生存森林/极端梯度提升树/生存期/比例风险回归模型/重症监护室

Key words

Lung transplantation/Machine learning/Prediction model/Random survival forest/Extreme gradient boosting tree/Survival period/Proportional hazards regression model/Intensive care unit

分类

临床医学

引用本文复制引用

史灵芝,陈静瑜,刘亚灵,严浩吉,喻赠玮,侯森林,刘明昭,杨航,吴波,田东..比较多种机器学习模型预测肺移植术后受者生存[J].器官移植,2025,16(2):264-271,8.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金(82470104) (82470104)

四川省医学科技创新项目(YCH-KY-YCZD2024-227) (YCH-KY-YCZD2024-227)

器官移植

OA北大核心

1674-7445

访问量5
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文