| 注册
首页|期刊导航|巴楚医学|负压封闭引流技术治疗毒蛇咬伤的疗效及安全性Meta分析

负压封闭引流技术治疗毒蛇咬伤的疗效及安全性Meta分析

赵雷 郭庆 姚邦燕

巴楚医学2025,Vol.8Issue(1):35-42,8.
巴楚医学2025,Vol.8Issue(1):35-42,8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-6113.2025.01.007

负压封闭引流技术治疗毒蛇咬伤的疗效及安全性Meta分析

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum Sealing Drainage in the Treatment of Venomous Snake Bites

赵雷 1郭庆 1姚邦燕1

作者信息

  • 1. 三峡大学第一临床医学院[宜昌市中心人民医院]急诊科,湖北宜昌 443003||三峡大学临床护理研究中心,湖北 宜昌 443003
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of vacuum sealing drainage(VSD)technology in the treatment of snake bites.Methods:We conducted the retrieval of databases,including the Cochrane Library,PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,CNKI,Wanfang,VIP and CBM,to collect randomized controlled trials on VSD treatment for snake bites.Data from clinical studies that meet the inclusion criteria were extracted and evaluated the quality using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews 5.0.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 16 software.Results:A total of 20 original studies involving 1,774 patients were included.Meta-analysis results showed that the overall effective rate of VSD treatment for snake bites was significantly higher than that of conventional incision and drainage(RR=1.18,95%CI:1.11,1.26).The number of hospitalization days(MD=-6.52,95%CI:-6.95,-6.08),days for limb swelling reduction(MD=-3.57,95%CI:-4.27,-2.87),days for skin grafting or second intention healing(MD=-4.35,95%CI:-4.74,-3.97),incidence of wound infection(RR=0.24,95%CI:0.15,0.37),and incidence of skin necrosis(RR=0.30,95%CI:0.21,0.43)were all significantly reduced(all P<0.05).Conclusion:The safety and efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage technology in treating snake bites are both good.

关键词

负压封闭引流技术/毒蛇咬伤/Meta分析

Key words

vacuum sealing drainage(VSD)/venomous snake bite/meta-analysis

分类

临床医学

引用本文复制引用

赵雷,郭庆,姚邦燕..负压封闭引流技术治疗毒蛇咬伤的疗效及安全性Meta分析[J].巴楚医学,2025,8(1):35-42,8.

基金项目

湖北省联合基金培育项目(2024AFD184) (2024AFD184)

巴楚医学

2096-6113

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文