重庆医学2025，Vol.54Issue(3)：696-700,708,6.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2025.03.024
外直肌倾斜后徙术与传统外直肌后徙术治疗集合不足型间歇性外斜视疗效比较的meta分析
Slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession versus conventional bilateral lateral recession for the convergence insufficiency type of intermittent exotropia:a meta-analysis
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy between slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession(S-BLR)and conventional bilateral lateral recession(C-BLR)procedure in the treatment of convergence insuffi-ciency-type intermittent exotropia.Methods Relevant studies published before November 2023 were systematically searched in PubMed,Cochrane Library,EmBase,Web of Science,CNKI,Wanfang and VIP databases to compare the surgical effects of S-BLR and C-BLR,expressed by OR value and 95%CI.The success rate,recurrence rate,overcor-rection rate and stereoscopic improvement rate were analyzed by random effects model.Results A total of 5 studies involving 296 patients were included in the analysis.The success rate of the S-BLR procedure was significantly higher than that of C-BLR(OR=4.06,95%CI:2.47-6.67,P＜0.001),patients subjected to the C-BLR pro-cedure were more likely to be recurrent(OR=0.21,95%CI:0.08-0.52,P＜0.001).No statistically signifi-cant differences in the combined results for overcorrection rates(OR=0.43,95%CI:0.07-2.52,P=0.35)and stereoscopic improvement rates(OR=0.82,95%CI:0.36-1.83,P=0.62)were present between the S-BLR and C-BLR procedures(P＞0.05).Conclusion S-BLR procedure has a higher success rate and a lower recurrence rate in patients with aggregation-deficient intermittent exotropia.关键词
集合不足型间歇性外斜视/外直肌倾斜后徙术/传统外直肌后徙术/手术治疗/meta分析Key words
convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia/slanted bilateral lateral rectus reces-sion/conventional bilateral lateral recession/surgical treatment/meta-analysis分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
赵秋语,陈黎,薛黎萍,胡敏..外直肌倾斜后徙术与传统外直肌后徙术治疗集合不足型间歇性外斜视疗效比较的meta分析[J].重庆医学,2025,54(3):696-700,708,6.基金项目
云南省卫生健康委员会医学领军人才培养计划(L-2018018) （L-2018018）
云南大学新一轮"双一流"建设项目(CY22624106). （CY22624106）
