灾害学2025,Vol.40Issue(2):61-64,76,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2025.02.009
超越二元之争:现代灾害风险科学研究的逻辑进路及转向
Beyond the Dualistic Debate:The Logical Approach and Direction of Modern Disaster Risk Science Research
摘要
Abstract
The discourse system for understanding and constructing modern disaster risks with high complexity and uncertainty is based on dualism,which is not conducive to understanding the inherent unity of facts and values in disaster events.By extracting the logical approach of"conceptualization instrumentalization operability"followed by modern disas-ter risk science research,the inherent debates between objective realism and social constructionism in risk cognition,risk analysis,and risk decision-making are explained,and the idea of replacing and surpassing traditional dualism with duality is proposed.Research suggests that in risk perception,emphasis should be placed on the dialectical unity of the objective reality and social constructiveness of disaster risks;In risk analysis,attention should be paid to the comprehensive analysis and judgment of objective disaster risk assessment and subjective disaster risk perception;In risk decision-making,it is necessary to be rooted in composite governance scenarios and use a mixture of scientific rationality and empirical materials to make overall decisions.An integrated perspective for the cognitive shift in modern disaster risk science research is provided,bearing certain reference value for facing the challenges of complexity in risk society and promoting theoretical innovation in modern disaster risk governance.关键词
灾害风险/二重性/客观实在性/社会建构性/逻辑进路Key words
disaster risk/duality/objective reality/social constructiveness/logical approach分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
王超..超越二元之争:现代灾害风险科学研究的逻辑进路及转向[J].灾害学,2025,40(2):61-64,76,5.基金项目
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"数智驱动的城市地下空间突发事件应急协同机制研究"(23YJC630173) (23YJC630173)
江苏省社会科学基金课题"长三角公共卫生应急物资保障一体化协同体系构建研究"(23GLC006) (23GLC006)
国家社科基金重大项目"新时代公共安全应急框架体系研究"(23ZDA117) (23ZDA117)
国家社科基金重点项目"加强国家城市地下空间应急管理体系和能力建设研究"(22AZD086) (22AZD086)