| 注册
首页|期刊导航|物探与化探|基于不同规范的重力仪性能试验的误差指标对比

基于不同规范的重力仪性能试验的误差指标对比

常小鹏 陈亮 张翔 乔衍溢 江成龙

物探与化探2025,Vol.49Issue(2):370-377,8.
物探与化探2025,Vol.49Issue(2):370-377,8.DOI:10.11720/wtyht.2025.1081

基于不同规范的重力仪性能试验的误差指标对比

Comparison of error indicators for performance tests of gravimeters based on different specifications

常小鹏 1陈亮 2张翔 2乔衍溢 3江成龙4

作者信息

  • 1. 中国地质调查局 地球物理调查中心,河北 廊坊 065000||中国地质调查局 地球浅地表探测技术创新中心,河北 廊坊 065000||中国地质大学(北京)地球物理与信息技术学院,北京 100083
  • 2. 中国地质调查局 地球物理调查中心,河北 廊坊 065000||中国地质调查局 地球浅地表探测技术创新中心,河北 廊坊 065000
  • 3. 中国地质调查局 廊坊自然资源综合调查中心,河北 廊坊 065000
  • 4. 中国地质调查局 地球物理调查中心,河北 廊坊 065000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

As an important part of gravity investigation,the performance tests of gravimeters are required throughout field surveys.In these tests,mean squared error(MSE),accuracy,and root mean squared error(RMSE)are commonly employedto quantitatively de-scribe the test results.The comparison of the theoretical equations for dynamic and consistency tests in specifications on geological sur-veys,petroleum,and measurement reveals a pronounced confusion in the usage of MSE,accuracy,and RMSE.This issue is observed in the consistent equations forconsistency testsin these specifications.Through investigations into the equations used in the dynamic and consistency tests inthe threespecifications,this study analyzed the differences between mean MSE and RMSE,elucidated the normativi-ty of RMSE relative to MSE,and determined the applicablerange of RMSE.To avoid confusion,it is recommended that accuracy be used for qualitative expression and RMSE for quantitative expression in these specifications.

关键词

重力测量/规范/性能试验/均方误差/精度/中误差

Key words

gravity measurement/specification/performance test/mean squared error/precision/root mean squared error

分类

天文与地球科学

引用本文复制引用

常小鹏,陈亮,张翔,乔衍溢,江成龙..基于不同规范的重力仪性能试验的误差指标对比[J].物探与化探,2025,49(2):370-377,8.

基金项目

中国地质调查局项目(DD20243177) (DD20243177)

物探与化探

1000-8918

访问量3
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文