徐州工程学院学报（社会科学版）2025，Vol.40Issue(1)：32-37,6.
中西认知方式差异的哲学审思
A Philosophical Analysis of the Disparity in Cognitive Approaches Between China and the West:GeWu ZhiZhi(Investigating Things to Attain Knowledge)Vs."The Understanding Legislates for Nature"
崔雨晴1
作者信息
- 1. 上海大学马克思主义学院,上海 200444
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Philosophy is often perceived as having originated in ancient Greece,leading Chinese scholars to predominantly adopt Western philosophical frameworks of ontology,epistemology,and existentialism when analyzing both Western and traditional Chinese philosophy.In reality,however,Chinese traditional philosophy diverges significantly from Western rationalist constructions in its epistemological orientation.Specifically,Chinese philosophy emphasizes"GeWu ZhiZhi"(格物致知)—Investigating Things to Attain Knowledge—as its primary mode of cognition,engaging with natural phenomena and ethical principles through direct observation and somatic reflection.By contrast,Western philosophy builds its knowledge systems on rational concepts,exploring and interpreting empirical reality through logical structures.The core divergence in knowledge systems between Chinese and Western philosophies can be largely attributed to their distinct cognitive approaches:Zhu Xi's"GeWu ZhiZhi"and Kant's"understanding legislates for nature."关键词
差异/切身体验/格物致知/理性建构Key words
cognitive difference/embodied experience/"GeWu ZhiZhi"(Investigating Things to Attain Knowledge)/rational construction分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
崔雨晴..中西认知方式差异的哲学审思[J].徐州工程学院学报（社会科学版）,2025,40(1):32-37,6.
