江苏大学学报（医学版）2025，Vol.35Issue(3)：250-256,7.DOI:10.13312/j.issn.1671-7783.y240132
经远端桡动脉与经股动脉入路外周介入治疗非冠脉疾病的多中心比较
Multicentre comparison of distal transradial versus transfemoral access for peripheral interventions in non-coronary artery disease
郑维淼 1宋蒨 1刘谨意 1聂璐 2王草叶 3徐强1
作者信息
- 1. 江苏大学附属武进医院介入血管科,江苏 常州 213017||徐州医科大学武进临床学院,江苏 常州 213017
- 2. 常州市妇幼保健院放射科,江苏 常州 213023
- 3. 苏州大学附属常州市第一人民医院介入科,江苏 常州 213003
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective:To compare the safety and efficacy of peripheral interventional procedures for non-coronary artery disease with the distal transradial access(dTRA)and transfemoral access(TFA).Methods:A total of 232 patients who underwent dTRA or TFA between April 2022 and April 2024 at Wujin Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University,and Changzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University were retrospectively included.General information,intraoperative and postoperative related indicators of the patients were collected to compare the differences between the two groups.Results:Puncture success rate,access-related complications,contrast agent dose during the procedure,fluoroscopy time,dose-area product and air kerma were similar between the two groups(P>0.05).The technical success rate,postoperative puncture site pain scores,postoperative bed rest time,and postoperative hospital stay in the dTRA group were significantly lower than those in the TFA group(P<0.05).Conversely,the time to puncture,the number of punctures,and the duration of surgery in the dTRA group were significantly higher than those in the TFA group(P<0.05).Conclusion:dTRA has early safety and feasibility for peripheral interventions of non-coronary artery disease,but dTRA is technically more challenging than TFA,resulting in a longer operation time.关键词
远端桡动脉入路/股动脉入路/非冠状动脉疾病Key words
distal transradial access/transfemoral access/non-coronary artery disease分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
郑维淼,宋蒨,刘谨意,聂璐,王草叶,徐强..经远端桡动脉与经股动脉入路外周介入治疗非冠脉疾病的多中心比较[J].江苏大学学报（医学版）,2025,35(3):250-256,7.
