太平洋学报2025，Vol.33Issue(4)：33-49,17.DOI:10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2025.04.003
霸权国推动国际组织改革的策略差异
Differences in the Strategies of the Hegemon in Promoting Reforms of International Organizations
摘要
Abstract
The reform of international organizations(IOs)has become a central issue in global governance.As the dominant global power,the United States frequently adopts differentiated strategies to promote certain reforms.While existing studies have observed IO reforms through the lenses of state-centrism and or-ganizational autonomy,they fail to pay sufficient attention to the strategic variation employed by hegemonic powers.This study argues that a hegemon's approach to reform is shaped by two key factors:its relative power enjoyed in the organization and the availability of alternative institutions.The former acts as a driving force,shaping the hegemon's initiative to reform;while the latter serves as a dragging force,shaping its at-titude—whether supportive or obstructive—toward reform.Hence the hegemon may adopt one of the four strategic approaches,i.e.the steering,the coercive,the exclusive,or the obstructive reform.This theoreti-cal framework can be justified through empirical case studies elaborated herein,including the U.S.support for technical quota adjustments in the International Monetary Fund(IMF),coercive reforms of the adminis-trative structure of UNESCO,exclusive reform efforts in the United Nations Security Council,and the ob-struction of the World Trade Organization's(WTO)dispute settlement mechanism.关键词
国际组织/美国霸权/制度竞争/全球治理Key words
international organizations/U.S.hegemony/institutional competition/global governance分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
杨双梅..霸权国推动国际组织改革的策略差异[J].太平洋学报,2025,33(4):33-49,17.基金项目
本文系北京外国语大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目和教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地复旦大学美国研究中心重大项目"美国国内政治大变局及其对中美战略博弈的影响研究"(22JJD810005)的阶段性研究成果. （22JJD810005）
