| 注册
首页|期刊导航|华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)|"哲学的贫困":什么哲学?什么贫困?

"哲学的贫困":什么哲学?什么贫困?

林进龙

华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Issue(3):25-39,15.
华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Issue(3):25-39,15.

"哲学的贫困":什么哲学?什么贫困?

"The Poverty of Philosophy":The Final Metaphysics and Marx's Critique

林进龙1

作者信息

  • 1. 清华大学马克思主义学院 北京100084||悉尼大学哲学系
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Following the disintegration of Hegelian metaphysics,both Marx and Proudhon independently seized upon the concepts of"contradiction"and"labor,"seeking to advance philosophical revolution by introducing dialectics into the a-nalysis of material life in order to unify logic with history(or reason with experience).Their competing answers along the same trajectory of"contradiction-labor-dialectics"imply that if Marx's philosophy constitutes a new philosophy,then,logically,Proudhon's philosophy necessarily forms the final metaphysics.That is to say,for Marx,the"poverty of philoso-phy"is the complete exposure of metaphysics in its"final effort"at self-redemption:no matter how contradiction provides the theoretical driving mechanism,labor furnishes the material foundation,and dialectics offers the explanatory tool,as long as one remains confined within the bounds of metaphysics,a true philosophical revolution is impossible.Therefore,the new philosophy must be anti-metaphysical.From this perspective,Marx's contribution lies in advancing philosophy from the experience-reason structure toward a history-praxis pathway,while the significance of Proudhon's work is that,through the ultimate ineffectiveness of his"final effort,"it provides a compelling counter-evidence of the legitimacy of Ma-rx's new philosophy.On this basis,it is necessary to reassess the philosophical-historical significance of their relation-ship.

关键词

马克思/蒲鲁东/黑格尔/《哲学的贫困》/《贫困的哲学》

Key words

Marx/Proudhon/Hegel/The Poverty of Philosophy/The Philosophy of Poverty

分类

社会科学

引用本文复制引用

林进龙.."哲学的贫困":什么哲学?什么贫困?[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,(3):25-39,15.

华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

1006-1398

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文