| 注册
首页|期刊导航|空间科学学报|TLE轨道反演大气密度精度评估

TLE轨道反演大气密度精度评估

任廷领 罗冰显 苗娟 王荣兰 王昕 刘四清

空间科学学报2025,Vol.45Issue(3):717-728,12.
空间科学学报2025,Vol.45Issue(3):717-728,12.DOI:10.11728/cjss2025.03.2024-0060

TLE轨道反演大气密度精度评估

Accuracy Assessment of the TLE-derived Orbital Atmospheric Densities

任廷领 1罗冰显 2苗娟 1王荣兰 1王昕 1刘四清1

作者信息

  • 1. 中国科学院国家空间科学中心空间天气学国家重点实验室 北京 100190||中国科学院国家空间科学中心太阳活动与空间天气重点实验室 北京 100190||中国科学院国家空间科学中心空间环境态势感知技术重点实验室 北京 100190
  • 2. 中国科学院国家空间科学中心空间天气学国家重点实验室 北京 100190||中国科学院国家空间科学中心太阳活动与空间天气重点实验室 北京 100190||中国科学院国家空间科学中心空间环境态势感知技术重点实验室 北京 100190||中国科学院大学 北京 101408
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

In this research,we derived TLE-based atmospheric densities along CHAMP and GRACE-A orbits,and the density errors were calculated based on the high-accuracy accelerometer densities,em-pirical models errors including NRLMSISE-00,JB2008 and MSIS2.0 were also estimated for comparison.Improvement ratios,which defined as the percentage of TLE density errors smaller than that of empiri-cal models,were given in the subsequent contents,and lay a theoretical foundation for the accuracy and application of the TLE-derived densities.TLE data ranged from 2002 to 2017,and two different kinds of densities,including TLE-averaged and TLE-calibrated densities,were derived.The former ones have a temporal resolution of 3 days,and were independent of the empirical models;the latter ones were cali-brated values which relies on the empirical models.Results indicate that the TLE-averaged densities have a general average error smaller than 5%,and a standard deviation no bigger than 8%;the TLE-cali-brated densities have the minimum errors during geomagnetic quiet conditions,with the improvement ratios bigger than 80%.

关键词

TLE反演密度/误差改善率/经验大气模式

Key words

TLE-derived densities/Improvement ratios/Empirical atmospheric models

分类

天文与地球科学

引用本文复制引用

任廷领,罗冰显,苗娟,王荣兰,王昕,刘四清..TLE轨道反演大气密度精度评估[J].空间科学学报,2025,45(3):717-728,12.

基金项目

中国科学院国防科技重点实验室基金(CXJJ-22S031)和中国科学院国家空间科学中心攀登项目(E1PD40017S)共同资助 (CXJJ-22S031)

空间科学学报

OA北大核心

0254-6124

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文