摘要
Abstract
When paying attention to algorithms in automated administration from the standpoint of administrative openness upheld by administrative law and institutionally responding to its transparency regulation,rather than pursuing a single path that is diffi-cult to be universally applied,it is better to adopt the concept of"differential"supervision,conform to the different characteristics of algorithms in automated administration,and abandon the uniformly applicable open path in methodology.Instead,through the summary and classification of practice,the paper abstracts the different risk levels of the algorithm's intervention in automated ad-ministration based on the actual impact of the algorithm on the right,and adapates the corresponding disclosure requirements to it,clarifying its disclosure degree and specific disclosure methods,to avoid the contradiction between the uncertainty of the substan-tial risk of the algorithm in automated administration and the universal applicability pursued by legal norms.关键词
行政透明/政府信息公开/算法风险等级/差序化公开/分类分级监管Key words
administrative transparency/disclosure of government information/algorithm risk level/differential ordering disclo-sure/classified and hierarchical supervision分类
社会科学
