| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国临床心理学杂志|中文版综合思维方式问卷在中国大学生群体中的测量学分析

中文版综合思维方式问卷在中国大学生群体中的测量学分析

赵靖实 胡悦 徐雪晴 袁博 李伟强

中国临床心理学杂志2025,Vol.33Issue(3):492-496,501,6.
中国临床心理学杂志2025,Vol.33Issue(3):492-496,501,6.DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2025.03.008

中文版综合思维方式问卷在中国大学生群体中的测量学分析

A Psychometric Analysis of the Chinese Version of the Comprehensive Thinking Styles Questionnaire among Chinese University Students

赵靖实 1胡悦 2徐雪晴 1袁博 1李伟强1

作者信息

  • 1. 宁波大学心理学系暨研究所,宁波 315211
  • 2. 宁波大学心理学系暨研究所,宁波 315211||象山县石浦中学,宁波 315211
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To assess the reliability and validity of comprehensive thinking styles questionnaire(CTSQ).Methods:A sample of 660 Chinese people were administrated the revised comprehensive thinking styles questionnaire.The cognitive reflection test and the science comprehension inventory were chosen as the criterion-related indicators.Re-sults:①The correlation between items and summary score ranged from 0.26 to 0.90.②Four factors(preference for intui-tive thinking,preference for effortful thinking,actively open-minded thinking,and close-minded thinking)were obtained through exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 61.30%.③The confirmatory factor analysis also identified a four-factor model,x2/df=2.78,CFI=0.909,TLI=0.898,RMSEA=0.070,SRMR=0.059.④The Cronbach's α for the total scale was 0.75,and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.57,based on data collected from 113 participants with retesting conducted one month later.⑤Using the cognitive reflection test and the science comprehen-sion test as external criteria,Pearson correlation analyses revealed that the closed-minded thinking(CMT)subscale was negatively correlated with cognitive reflection(r=-0.37)and scientific knowledge(r=-0.16),while the preference for effort-ful thinking(PET)subscale was positively correlated with cognitive reflection(r=0.15)and scientific knowledge(r=0.20).Conclusion:The comprehensive thinking styles questionnaire has good reliability and validity among Chinese university students.

关键词

思维风格/综合思维方式/双加工理论/信度/效度

Key words

Thinking style/Comprehensive thinking styles/Dual-process theory/Reliability/Validity

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

赵靖实,胡悦,徐雪晴,袁博,李伟强..中文版综合思维方式问卷在中国大学生群体中的测量学分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2025,33(3):492-496,501,6.

基金项目

本研究得到全国教育科学规划一般项目"新时期中小学生诚信价值观的形成机制及培育策略研究"(BHA200158)与浙江省大学生科技创新活动计划(新苗人才计划2023R405016)资助. (BHA200158)

中国临床心理学杂志

OA北大核心

1005-3611

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文