| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国临床心理学杂志|脱轨量表6题版的中文版修订

脱轨量表6题版的中文版修订

王一云 苏迪 戴莉 杭亚明 乔志宏

中国临床心理学杂志2025,Vol.33Issue(3):508-511,484,5.
中国临床心理学杂志2025,Vol.33Issue(3):508-511,484,5.DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2025.03.011

脱轨量表6题版的中文版修订

Revision of the Chinese Version of the Derailment Scale-6

王一云 1苏迪 2戴莉 3杭亚明 4乔志宏4

作者信息

  • 1. 北京师范大学未来教育学院,珠海 519087||河北经贸大学,石家庄 050061
  • 2. 宁夏大学学生心理健康咨询中心,银川 750021||清华大学心理与认知科学系,北京 100084
  • 3. 北京师范大学心理学部,北京 100875||深圳理工大学,深圳 518055
  • 4. 北京师范大学心理学部,北京 100875
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:The purpose of this study was to revise the derailment scale-6(DS-6)into a Chinese version and examine its reliability and validity.Methods:This study employed a total of 1234 participants across three samples by on-line and offline methods.The Beck depression inventory-Ⅱ(BDI-Ⅱ)and the self-concept clarity scale(SCCS)were used as criterion measures.Results:The item analysis of the Chinese version of DS-6 yielded satisfactory results,with all six items retained.Consistent with the original version,the exploratory factor analysis(EFA),based on the criterion of eigenvalues greater than 1,yielded a single-factor structure.The confirmatory factor analysis validated the factorial structure of the original scale.The main fit indices were x2/df=3.63,CFI=0.97,TLI=0.95,SRMR=0.04,and RMSEA=0.00.The criterion va-lidity of the Chinese version of DS-6 was supported by significant positive correlations with depression scores(r=0.36,P<0.01)and significant negative correlations with self-concept clarity scores(r=-0.49,P<0.01).The Cronbach's alpha coeffi-cient for the Chinese version of DS-6 was 0.72,split-half reliability was 0.70,and test-retest reliability was 0.60.Conclu-sion:The Chinese version of DS-6 demonstrated good validity and reliability.

关键词

脱轨/量表修订/信度/效度

Key words

Derailment/Scale revision/Reliability/Validity

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

王一云,苏迪,戴莉,杭亚明,乔志宏..脱轨量表6题版的中文版修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2025,33(3):508-511,484,5.

基金项目

国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD153). (20&ZD153)

中国临床心理学杂志

OA北大核心

1005-3611

访问量2
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文