| 注册
首页|期刊导航|实用医学杂志|不同MRI测量方式评估乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效的临床价值

不同MRI测量方式评估乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效的临床价值

段玉灵 王梅 周雪枝 李永义 马丽霞 杨德盛 程姣 伍燕 刘桃 蒋国元

实用医学杂志2025,Vol.41Issue(14):2152-2159,8.
实用医学杂志2025,Vol.41Issue(14):2152-2159,8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.14.005

不同MRI测量方式评估乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效的临床价值

Clinical value analysis of different MRI measurement methods in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

段玉灵 1王梅 2周雪枝 1李永义 1马丽霞 1杨德盛 3程姣 4伍燕 1刘桃 1蒋国元1

作者信息

  • 1. 遵义医科大学第三附属医院(遵义市第一人民医院)乳甲外科(贵州遵义 563000)
  • 2. 遵义医科大学第三附属医院(遵义市第一人民医院)老年病科(贵州遵义 563000)
  • 3. 遵义市红花岗区人民医院普外科(贵州遵义 563000)
  • 4. 遵义医科大学第三附属医院(遵义市第一人民医院)病理科(贵州遵义 563000)
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the diagnostic performance of three breast MRI measurement methods—RECIST 1.1,the optimal method,and three-dimensional(3D)volumetric assessment—in assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)in breast cancer patients,with the objective of identifying the most clinically practical approach.Methods A total of 110 breast cancer patients who underwent NAC followed by surgical treatment between 2019 and 2023 were included in the study.Breast magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)was conducted within one week before and after the completion of NAC.Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 criteria,widely recognized as the optimal method,as well as 3D volume measurement.Pathological response was determined according to the Miller-Payne grading system.Sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC)were computed and compared using the DeLong test.Results The AUC values for RECIST 1.1,the optimal method,and 3D volumetric assessment were 0.768,0.795,and 0.883,respectively.The 3D volumetric assessment exhibited significantly better discriminative performance(P<0.05),with the highest sensitivity(98.9%),specificity(77.8%),and accuracy(95.5%).Additionally,the optimal method demonstrated superior performance over RECIST 1.1 across multiple parameters.Conclusions 3D volumetric mea-surement demonstrates superior performance compared to RECIST 1.1 and the optimal method in evaluating the response to NAC,offering a more accurate and comprehensive assessment tool.Additionally,the optimal method shows advantages over RECIST 1.1 and may serve as a practical alternative in settings where 3D software is not available.

关键词

乳腺癌/磁共振成像/新辅助化疗/三维测量/疗效评估/ROC曲线

Key words

breast cancer/magnetic resonance imaging/neoadjuvant chemotherapy/3D volume measurement/efficacy evaluation/ROC curve

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

段玉灵,王梅,周雪枝,李永义,马丽霞,杨德盛,程姣,伍燕,刘桃,蒋国元..不同MRI测量方式评估乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效的临床价值[J].实用医学杂志,2025,41(14):2152-2159,8.

基金项目

遵义市科技计划项目(编号:遵市科合HZ[2022]_67号,遵市科合HZ字[2024]49号) (编号:遵市科合HZ[2022]_67号,遵市科合HZ字[2024]49号)

实用医学杂志

OA北大核心

1006-5725

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文