海南热带海洋学院学报2025，Vol.32Issue(4)：10-18,9.DOI:10.13307/j.issn.2096-3122.2025.04.02
菲律宾与"仲裁庭"关于太平岛淡水的观点之谬
Fallacies in the Philippines and the"Arbitral Tribunal's"Claims Regarding Freshwater on Taiping Island
摘要
Abstract
In"the South China Sea Arbitration Case",the Philippines and its experts selectively interpreted Taiwan's survey data and other documents to deny the objective fact that Taiping Island was capable of sustaining human habita-tion.The"arbitral tribunal",on one hand,rejected the Philippines'arguments and cited British and Japanese naviga-tional records,survey reports,and other non-conclusive evidence to confirm the availability of freshwater on these is-lands.On the other hand,it paradoxically concluded that the geographical features were manifestly unsuitable for habita-tion in assessing freshwater issue on the islands.Numerous navigational documents,investigation reports,and related ma-terials,are sufficient to prove that the freshwater supply on these islands can sustain human survival.关键词
菲律宾/"南海仲裁案"/太平岛/淡水Key words
the Philippines/"the South China Sea Arbitration Case"/Taiping Island/freshwater分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
王静..菲律宾与"仲裁庭"关于太平岛淡水的观点之谬[J].海南热带海洋学院学报,2025,32(4):10-18,9.基金项目
国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(24FZSB063) （24FZSB063）
