| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国临床药理学杂志|阿戈美拉汀与文拉法辛缓释治疗围绝经期抑郁症患者的临床研究

阿戈美拉汀与文拉法辛缓释治疗围绝经期抑郁症患者的临床研究

朱莹 王声滂 叶猛飞

中国临床药理学杂志2025,Vol.41Issue(13):1806-1810,5.
中国临床药理学杂志2025,Vol.41Issue(13):1806-1810,5.DOI:10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.13.002

阿戈美拉汀与文拉法辛缓释治疗围绝经期抑郁症患者的临床研究

Clinical trial of agomelatine and venlafaxine sustained-release tablet in the treatment of patients with perimenopausal depression

朱莹 1王声滂 2叶猛飞2

作者信息

  • 1. 绍兴市第七人民医院,药剂科,浙江绍兴 312000
  • 2. 绍兴市第七人民医院,精神科,浙江绍兴 312000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of agomelatine tablet and venlafaxine sustained-release tablet in the treatment of patients with perimenopausal depression.Methods Patients with perimenopausal depression were divided into control group and treatment group according to random number table method.The control group was given venlafaxine sustained-release tablet 75 mg,taken orally in the morning or before going to bed,once a day,and the treatment group was given agomelatine 25 mg orally before bed,once a day.Both groups were treated for 3 months.The clinical efficacy,depression severity[Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS)],neurotransmitters[norepinephrine(NE),5-hydroxytryptamine(5-HT),dopamine(DA)],reproductive endocrine hormones[follicle stimulating hormone(FSH),luteinizing hormone(LH),estradiol(E2),testosterone(T)],Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI)and safety were compared between the two groups of patients.Results There were no shedding cases,and 57 patients in control group and 57 patients in treatment group were enrolled.After treatment,the total effective rates in treatment group and control group were 96.49%(55 cases/57 cases)and 91.23%(52 cases/57 cases)respectively(P>0.05).At 3 months after treatment,NE levels in treatment group and control group were(135.78±15.56)and(128.33±13.41)ng·L-1,5-HT levels were(285.41±27.47)and(270.29±25.71)ng·L-1,DA levels were(36.04±5.37)and(33.89±5.01)ng·L-1,FSH levels were(4.11±0.93)and(3.58±0.84)U·L-1,LH levels were(5.18±1.01)and(4.54±0.83)U·L-1,E2 levels were(86.91±11.23)and(98.09±13.41)mmol·L-1,T levels were(1.35±0.34)and(1.06±0.31)mmol·L-1,MADRS scores were(29.41±2.77)and(35.63±2.91)points,and PSQI scores were(6.21±1.28)and(7.85±1.87)points respectively,the differences of above indexes were statistically significant between two groups(all P<0.05).The adverse drug reactions in treatment group were mainly vomiting and dizziness,and those in control group were mainly dizziness,vomiting and hypertension.The total incidence rates of adverse drug reactions in treatment group and control group were 5.26%and 17.54%,respectively(P<0.05).Conclusion Agomelatine and venlafaxine sustained-release tablet have shown significant efficacy in the treatment of perimenopausal depression,but the former one is more advantageous in improving depression severity,neurotransmitters and sleep quality,with better safety.

关键词

阿戈美拉汀片/文拉法辛缓释片/围绝经期抑郁症/临床疗效/安全性

Key words

agomelatine tablet/venlafaxine sustained-release tablet/perimenopausal depression/clinical efficacy/safety

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

朱莹,王声滂,叶猛飞..阿戈美拉汀与文拉法辛缓释治疗围绝经期抑郁症患者的临床研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2025,41(13):1806-1810,5.

中国临床药理学杂志

OA北大核心

1001-6821

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文