华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）Issue(4)：83-97,15.
不法原因给付反价值性困局与脱法性裁判的生成逻辑及制度矫正
Illegality Paradox and Evasive Judgments:Reasons and Institutional Remedies
摘要
Abstract
Judicial practice regarding causa turpis(performance based on an illegal cause)faces a dual dilemma.First,the Illegality Paradox-biased outcomes from private law dispositions made without public law evaluation-stems from a frac-tured public-private law coordination mechanism.Resolving this requires a"dual-track"solution:strengthening public-private law linkage via a mandatory review and referral mechanism for gains subject to public law confiscation,coupled with judicial restraint where such confiscation norms are absent.Second,evasive judgments arise from the rigidity of the current normative system.Its"absolute restitution"framework struggles with complex ethical scenarios involving value conflicts,compelling judges to exceed literal interpretation,creating a fissure between judgment and statute-the hallmark of evasive judgments.Mitigating this necessitates sufficient normative justification(interpretative and legislative)for non-restitution outcomes.关键词
不法原因给付/法律行为无效/不当得利/追缴Key words
performance based on an illegal cause(causa turpis)/invalidity of the juristic act/unjust enrichment/confis-cation分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
谭吉,罗逸凡..不法原因给付反价值性困局与脱法性裁判的生成逻辑及制度矫正[J].华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2025,(4):83-97,15.基金项目
高等教育科学研究规划重点项目"高校基金会法律保障制度研究"(22JJ0304) （22JJ0304）
