重庆高教研究2025，Vol.13Issue(5)：36-48,13.DOI:10.15998/j.cnki.issn1673-8012.2025.05.003
学位争议多元解决机制的实践检视、价值基准与规范完善
Practical Examination,Value Benchmarks,and Normative Improvements of the Pluralistic Resolution Mechanism for Academic Degree Disputes
摘要
Abstract
The pluralistic resolution mechanism for academic degree disputes comprises academic review,degree reconsideration,educational appeal,administrative reconsideration,and administrative litigation.This mechanism currently faces two practical dilemmas:on the one hand,Articles 40 and 41 of the Degree Law are too principled,leading to conflicts in the provisions of the detailed rules for the implementation of degree-granting units and disputes over the legal validity of academic review decisions;on the other hand,the legislative approach of Article 41 through reference provisions neglects the insufficient normative supply for external dispute resolution mechanisms,resulting in incomplete procedural norms for educational appeals and administrative reconsideration in degree disputes,as well as the absence of cohesive mechanisms between non-litigation and litigation procedures.To address these issues,systematic improvements should be made to the pluralistic resolution mechanism.In constructing internal value benchmarks,the protection of degree applicants' legitimate rights and interests serves as the purpose value,safeguarding their right to education and access to remedies;the independence of procedural structures across degree dispute resolution mechanisms functions as the functional value,particularly distinguishing educational appeals from administrative reconsideration;and in terms of procedural value,the principle of due process should be followed,establishing mechanisms for expert recusal and hearings.In terms of external normative improvement,the degree evaluation subcommittee should be the decision-making body for academic review acceptance,and the departmental academic committee should be the organizational body for experts.The degree-granting unit should also establish a degree review handling committee.External supervisory agencies have the authority to review the legality of academic review procedures.The provincial degree committee should be the body for handling educational appeals,and Article 41"and other behaviors"is interpreted as"behaviors related to degree conferment or revocation that directly restrict the legitimate rights and interests of degree applicants".Judicial review follows the principle of proportionality in reviewing academic standards,and applies a judgment of performance in specific cases.关键词
学位争议/多元解决机制/内部解决机制/外部解决机制/司法审查Key words
degree disputes/multiple resolution mechanisms/internal resolution mechanism/external resolution mechanism/judicial review分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
车骋..学位争议多元解决机制的实践检视、价值基准与规范完善[J].重庆高教研究,2025,13(5):36-48,13.基金项目
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"类型化思维下教育法适度法典化的体系构造研究"(23YJC880159) （23YJC880159）
河南省哲学社会科学教育强省研究项目"数字教育伦理风险及其立法规制研究"(2025JYQS0005) （2025JYQS0005）
