| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国口腔种植学杂志|根盾技术在上颌单颗前牙即刻种植修复中的美学效果与临床分析

根盾技术在上颌单颗前牙即刻种植修复中的美学效果与临床分析

张佳园 刘辉 黄诗诗 陈颖 陈庆生

中国口腔种植学杂志2025,Vol.30Issue(5):456-463,8.
中国口腔种植学杂志2025,Vol.30Issue(5):456-463,8.DOI:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.10.005

根盾技术在上颌单颗前牙即刻种植修复中的美学效果与临床分析

Aesthetic outcomes and clinical analysis of the socket-shield technique in immediate implant restoration of a single maxillary anterior tooth

张佳园 1刘辉 2黄诗诗 3陈颖 4陈庆生1

作者信息

  • 1. 杭州口腔医院城西分院 310000||杭州医学院存济口腔医学院 杭州医学院附属口腔医院 310012
  • 2. 杭州口腔医院城西分院 310000
  • 3. 杭州医学院存济口腔医学院 杭州医学院附属口腔医院 310012
  • 4. 新昌县中医院口腔科,绍兴 312500,浙江
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of the socket-shield technique in immediate implant restoration of a single maxillary anterior tooth in a retrospective study.Methods A total of 86 patients who underwent immediate implant restoration of a single maxillary anterior tooth at our hospital from April 2021 to March 2022 were selected and divided into two groups according to different implant surgical techniques,with 43 patients in each group.The socket-shield technique group(experimental group)received immediate implant placement combined with the root membrane technique,while the conventional implant group(control group)underwent minimally invasive tooth extraction followed by immediate implant placement.Implant survival rate,complication rate,and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Additionally,probing depth(PD),pink esthetic score(PES),white esthetic score(WES),and modified bleeding index(mBI)were assessed pre-and postoperatively between the two groups.Results The implant retention rate was 95.35%in the socket-shield technique group and 88.37%in the conventional implant group,with no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P=0.237).Patient satisfaction in terms of soft tissue color,overall esthetics,chewing comfort,and total score was significantly higher in the experimental group(P<0.001),with scores of(8.72±0.90),(9.13±0.54),(8.45±0.67),and(25.36±1.42),respectively,compared with(7.36±1.45),(8.22±1.30),(7.01±1.63),and(22.59±1.74)in the control group.Preoperatively,there were no significant differences in PES,mBI,and PD between the two groups(P>0.05).Postoperatively,PES and WES were significantly higher in the experimental group[(8.68±0.89)and(9.01±0.33)]than in the control group[(7.25±1.41)and(8.30±0.76)](P<0.001).The socket-shield technique group also exhibited significantly lower mBI and PD values[(0.27±0.08)and(2.35±0.68)mm]than the control group[(1.39±0.36)and(3.27±0.91)mm](P<0.001).Additionally,the complication rate in the socket-shield technique group was 9.30%,which was not significantly different from that in the conventional implant group(13.95%;P=0.501).Conclusion Both treatment modalities demonstrated high Implant retention rates and safety profiles.However,the socket-shield technique exhibited superior esthetic outcomes and higher patient satisfaction in the immediate implant restoration of a single maxillary anterior tooth,making it worthy of broader clinical application and promotion.

关键词

即刻种植修复/根盾技术/上颌单颗前牙/不翻瓣即刻种植

Key words

Immediate implant/Socket-shield technique/Maxillary anterior tooth/Flapless immediate implant

引用本文复制引用

张佳园,刘辉,黄诗诗,陈颖,陈庆生..根盾技术在上颌单颗前牙即刻种植修复中的美学效果与临床分析[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2025,30(5):456-463,8.

基金项目

2023年度"领雁"研发攻关计划(2023C03070) The Zhejiang Province 2023 Annual"Leading Geese"R&D Program(2023C03070) (2023C03070)

中国口腔种植学杂志

1007-3957

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文