首页|期刊导航|心脑血管病防治|基于Meta分析的能谱CT与传统多层螺旋CT诊断颈动脉易损斑块的准确性比较研究

基于Meta分析的能谱CT与传统多层螺旋CT诊断颈动脉易损斑块的准确性比较研究OA

A comparative study on the accuracy of spectral CT versus traditional multi-slice spiral CT in diagnosing vulnerable plaques in carotid artery based on a Meta-analysis

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 比较能谱CT与传统多层螺旋CT对颈动脉易损斑块的诊断准确性.方法 在PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science、CBM、中国知网和万方数据库中检索建库至2025年1月10日期间有关CT诊断颈动脉易损斑块的临床诊断试验.应用Review Manager 5.4软件中诊断准确性研究质量评价(QUADAS-2)评价系统对纳入的文献进行偏倚风险评估,同时应用Meta-Disc 1.4 版和Stata 18.0 版软件进行统计分析.结果 共纳入文献 12 篇,其中能谱CT纳入 5 篇研究,传统多层螺旋CT纳入 7 篇研究.能谱CT和传统多层螺旋CT诊断颈动脉易损斑块的合并敏感度分别为0.92(95%CI=0.81~0.97)、0.60(95%CI=0.31~0.83),合并特异度分别为 0.92(95%CI=0.86~0.96)、0.80(95%CI=0.51~0.94),合并阳性似然比分别为12.25(95%CI=6.46~23.20)、2.93(95%CI=0.79~10.86),合并阴性似然比分别为0.08(95%CI=0.03~0.22)、0.51(95%CI=0.22~1.18),合并诊断比值比分别为150.03(95%CI=39.19~574.40)、5.76(95%CI=0.71~46.57),受试者工作特征曲线的曲线下面积分别为0.94(95%CI=0.92~0.96)和0.77(95%CI=0.73~0.80).结论 能谱CT对于颈动脉易损斑块的诊断效能高于传统多层螺旋CT.

Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of spectral CT and traditional multi-slice spiral CT for vulnerable carotid artery plaques.Methods Clinical diagnostic tests on CT detection of vulnerable carotid plaques were systematically searched in PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,Web of Science,CBM,CNKI,and Wanfang Data from inception to January 10,2025.The quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2(QUADAS-2)evaluation system in Review Manager 5.4 was applied to assess the risk of bias in the included literature,while Meta-Disc 1.4 and Stata 18.0 were used for statistical analysis.Results A total of 12 studies were included in this analysis,with 5 using the spectral CT and 7 using the conventional multi-slice CT.The pooled sensitivity of spectral CT and conventional multi-slice CT in the diagnosis of carotid artery vulnerable plaque were 0.92(95%CI=0.81-0.97)and 0.60(95%CI=0.31-0.83),respectively,and the pooled specificity were 0.92(95%CI=0.86-0.96),0.80(95%CI=0.51-0.94),respectively,and the pooled positive likelihood ratios were 12.25(95%CI=6.46-23.20)and 2.93(95%CI=0.79-10.86),respectively,and the pooled negative likelihood ratios were 0.08(95%CI=0.03-0.22),0.51(95%CI=0.22-1.18),and diagnostic odds ratios were 150.03(95%CI=39.19-574.40)and 5.76(95%CI=0.71-46.57),respectively.The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.94(95%CI=0.92-0.96)and 0.77(95%CI=0.73-0.80),respectively.Conclusion The diagnostic value of spectral CT for carotid artery vulnerable plaques is higher than that of conventional multi-slice CT.

丁李洁;于文静;曹志坚

310000 杭州,浙江中医药大学||314000 嘉兴,浙江省荣军医院(嘉兴大学附属第三医院)放射科310000 杭州,浙江中医药大学附属第一医院(浙江省中医院)放射科310000 杭州,浙江中医药大学附属第一医院(浙江省中医院)放射科

能谱CT颈动脉易损斑块Meta分析诊断性试验

Spectral CTCarotid arteryVulnerable plaquesMeta-analysisDiagnostic test

《心脑血管病防治》 2025 (9)

31-35,40,6

10.3969/j.issn.1009-816x.2025.09.007

评论