科技与出版Issue(11)：77-84,8.
数智时代跨学科研究成果署名争议治理路径研究
Ethical Analysis and Governance Pathways of Authorship Disputes in Interdisciplinary Research in Digital-Intelligent Era
摘要
Abstract
The deep penetration of digital and intelligent technologies has established interdisciplinary research as the core form of knowledge production,injecting momentum into the deep integration in academic publishing while also highlighting disputes regarding research authorship attribution.These authorship disputes erode the foundation of academic integrity and present a significant barrier to the deep development of interdisciplinary research.This paper analyzes 43 cases of interdisciplinary authorship disputes reported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China from 2020 to 2024.The research employs a three-dimensional analytical framework encompassing"institution,technology,and ethics,"combined with the CRediT contributor role classification method and blockchain technology,to conduct a comprehensive investigation.The findings reveal that the core contradictions of interdisciplinary authorship disputes are concentrated in three aspects:First,the research paradigm differences between natural sciences(which prioritize empirical data and technological development)and social sciences(which emphasize theoretical construction and ethical analysis)lead to divergent perceptions of contributions,often neglecting implicit contributions such as"interdisciplinary coordination."Second,the lack of unified quantification standards and weight conversion mechanisms for multiple contributions,including technological development and theoretical innovation,leads to difficulties in comparing contributions.Third,interest-driven misuse of authorship rights frequently occurs,including improper behaviors such as"honorary authorship","guest authorship",ghostwriting and submission,and identity impersonation.The underlying causes manifest at multiple levels:institutionally,there is a lack of exclusive contribution recognition standards and regulatory mechanisms for interdisciplinary research;technically,traditional recording systems are fragmented,and blockchain certification applications lag behind;and ethically,academic ethics are out of order,and the imbalance between scientific research interests and benefits is evident.Consequently,this paper proposes a collaborative governance approach:institutionally,improving the CRediT classification system(adding an interdisciplinary coordination category,refining methodological classification,and establishing a contribution weight conversion mechanism)to standardize contribution recognition,while establishing a full-cycle attribution ethics review system for interdisciplinary projects;technically,building a blockchain-based transparent contribution traceability platform with artificial intelligence-assisted attribution review tools;and ethically,establishing a multi-stakeholder collaborative mechanism involving self-supervision by the academic community,full-process control by publishing institutions,and coordinated punishment by policies and industries.This paper illuminates the distinctive characteristics of interdisciplinary authorship disputes within the Chinese academic ecosystem,providing theoretical support and practical pathways for scientific research management departments to establish specific norms and for academic communities to efficiently resolve authorship disputes.Furthermore,it offers valuable insights for improving the ethical system of academic publishing in the digital and intelligent era while promoting the healthy development of interdisciplinary research.关键词
数智技术/出版深度融合/跨学科研究/署名争议/伦理/治理Key words
digital-intelligent technology/deep integration of publishing/interdisciplinary research/authorship disputes/ethics/governance引用本文复制引用
朱绍煜..数智时代跨学科研究成果署名争议治理路径研究[J].科技与出版,2025,(11):77-84,8.基金项目
中国科技期刊卓越行动计划二期项目(卓越二期-B2-040) （卓越二期-B2-040）
韬奋基金会2025年度入选课题(TF2025053) （TF2025053）
广东省科技期刊优秀人才项目(2025A1212150019) （2025A1212150019）
广东省医学科研基金项目(B2024234) （B2024234）
广东省科技期刊编辑学会一般项目(2024-YB-10). （2024-YB-10）
