中国司法鉴定Issue(1)：55-63,9.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2026.01.007
民事鉴定意见质证实质化进程中的"三重逻辑"和实现路径
The Triple Logic and Realization Paths in the Substantiation Process of Cross-examining Civil Appraisal Opinions
摘要
Abstract
By sorting out the triple logic underpinning the substantiation process of cross-examining civil appraisal opinions since 1979,we find that the first dimension has achieved a cognitive shift from conclusion to opinion,yet still tends to examine appraisal opinions from a static,results-oriented perspective.In the second dimension,appraisers'court appearances have yielded notable effects,but the relevant rules remain overly broad;while the system allowing expert assistants to appear in court has been established,their litigation status remains controversial,with a mismatch between rights protection and role positioning.As for the third dimension,judges'participation in cross-examination is mired in a dilemma of ambiguous role orientation and inadequate professional competence,which blocks the path connecting cross-examination to the formation of judicial conviction.In view of the above,the substantiation of cross-examination for civil appraisal opinions in China should be based on the binary framework of expert confrontation.First,it is imperative to dynamically grasp the entire generation process of appraisal opinions from a life−cycle perspective.Second,guided by the principle of equal confrontation,we should refine the rules governing appraisers'court appearance,clarify the scientific position of expert assistants,and establish a right protection mechanism for them to obtain information throughout the judicial authentication process in light of their role as technical representatives.Third,efforts should be made to enhance judges'cross-examination capabilities,thereby smoothing the path from cross-examination to judicial conviction and enabling a more effective response to modern litigation.关键词
民事鉴定意见/专家辅助人/鉴定人出庭/质证/心证Key words
civil appraisal opinion/expert assistant/appearance of appraisers in court/cross-examination/judicial conviction分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
张凌燕,卫燕茹..民事鉴定意见质证实质化进程中的"三重逻辑"和实现路径[J].中国司法鉴定,2026,(1):55-63,9.基金项目
2024年度重庆市自然科学基金创新发展联合基金项目(CSTB2024NSCQ-LZX0089) （CSTB2024NSCQ-LZX0089）
2023年重庆市教育委员会科学技术研究计划项目(KJZD-M202300301) （KJZD-M202300301）
2024年陕西省社会科学基金年度项目(2024E026). （2024E026）
