| 注册
首页|期刊导航|工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程|多类型电力市场主体有效容量差异化评估方法研究

多类型电力市场主体有效容量差异化评估方法研究

梁家豪 刘敦楠 李雪松 郝泽 王灿

工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程2026,Vol.18Issue(1):41-58,18.
工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程2026,Vol.18Issue(1):41-58,18.DOI:10.3724/j.issn.1674-4969.20250143

多类型电力市场主体有效容量差异化评估方法研究

Research on Differentiated Assessment Methods for Effective Capacity of Multi-Type Electricity Market Participants

梁家豪 1刘敦楠 2李雪松 3郝泽 1王灿1

作者信息

  • 1. 华北电力大学 经济与管理学院,北京 102206
  • 2. 华北电力大学 经济与管理学院,北京 102206||新能源电力与低碳发展北京市重点实验室,北京 102206
  • 3. 江苏电力交易中心有限公司,南京 210000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

The high proportion of renewable energy grid integration imposes greater demands on the adequacy of various regulatory capacities,including peak shaving,frequency regulation,ramping,and reserve capacity.Currently,China has initiated capacity compensation mechanisms based on capacity pricing but has yet to establish a capacity market.Market mechanism designs—including compensation calculations,cost allocation,and balancing responsibility assignment—remain constrained by the absence of assessment methods for evaluating the flexible regulation contributions of different types of entities.Therefore,there is an urgent need to develop a differentiated assessment method for effective capacity across multiple entities.This approach will provide theoretical support for advancing China's capacity pricing compensation mechanisms,capacity market development,and the design of market systems for reserve,ramping,and ancillary services. The proposed multi-type entities effective capacity assessment methodology integrates historical forecast and actual output data of the subject units,operational and regulation performance parameters,along with historical system load data and inter-provincial interconnection data.It differentiates the assessment of system power,frequency regulation,ramping capability,and reserve capacity performance for various unit types from the perspectives of power contribution during critical periods and flexible regulation capability.The fuzzy TOPSIS method resolves uncertainties and ambiguities in unit reliability levels,reasonably reflecting different unit types'ability to ensure long-term system capacity adequacy and respond to short-term regulation demands.Furthermore,this study quantifies the system's demand for different capacity types and their value by calculating multi-type capacity supply-demand coefficients and system capacity shortfall risk indicators.Based on this,the effective capacity correlation coefficients for diverse units under multi-type capacity demands are computed using a unified evaluation model and process. The paper designs quantitative indicators for unit reliability levels by considering power contributions during critical periods and flexible regulation capabilities.It proposes system capacity value assessment indicators that incorporate multi-type capacity supply-demand coefficients and capacity shortfall risks to determine the actual contribution capacity of different unit types toward supporting system capacity adequacy and flexibility.Through case study analysis,this paper quantitatively calculates the reliability assessments and system capacity values of different units,thereby enabling differentiated evaluations of the effective capacity of various unit types.The case study validates that the proposed effective capacity evaluation method can assess differentiated effective capacities for various entities,including renewable energy sources,under different seasonal conditions.Simultaneously,the case study conducts a differentiated dynamic assessment of changes in the effective capacity coefficients of various entities under different capacity supply-demand scenarios,further demonstrating the applicability of the proposed multi-entity effective capacity evaluation method to changes in system capacity supply-demand conditions. This multi-type entities effective capacity evaluation method balances agent reliability levels and system capacity value,providing a rational approach to quantify the differentiated contributions of various agents to power system capacity adequacy.It lays a theoretical foundation for China to explore establishing reliable capacity assessment mechanisms for diverse agents and developing capacity compensation mechanisms tailored to different agent types.

关键词

主体有效容量评估/主体可靠性水平/容量价值/容量补偿机制

Key words

entity effective capacity assessment/entity reliability level/capacity value/capacity compensation mechanism

分类

管理科学

引用本文复制引用

梁家豪,刘敦楠,李雪松,郝泽,王灿..多类型电力市场主体有效容量差异化评估方法研究[J].工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程,2026,18(1):41-58,18.

基金项目

国家社会科学基金重大项目:新能源产业区域协同发展机制研究(24&ZD111) (24&ZD111)

国家电网有限公司科技项目:考虑新能源波动性和新型主体调节潜力的电力市场平衡保障机制设计及关键技术研究(5108-202455365A-3-1-DG) (5108-202455365A-3-1-DG)

工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程

1674-4969

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文