| 注册
首页|期刊导航|发育医学电子杂志|不同治疗方案对6~9岁注意缺陷多动障碍患儿疗效的对比研究

不同治疗方案对6~9岁注意缺陷多动障碍患儿疗效的对比研究

朱才荣 江蕙芸 蒙晓梅 沈榕 覃秋萍

发育医学电子杂志2026,Vol.14Issue(1):20-27,8.
发育医学电子杂志2026,Vol.14Issue(1):20-27,8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5340.2026.01.004

不同治疗方案对6~9岁注意缺陷多动障碍患儿疗效的对比研究

Comparative study of therapeutic efficacy of different treatment regimens in children aged 6-9 years with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

朱才荣 1江蕙芸 1蒙晓梅 1沈榕 1覃秋萍1

作者信息

  • 1. 广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院 儿童保健科,广西 南宁 530000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of different treatment regimens on children aged 6-9 years with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder(ADHD).Methods A case-control study was conducted,enrolling 218 children with ADHD treated in the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from March 2020 to January 2022.Participants were divided into four groups based on different treatment regimens:parent training group(n=35),combined executive function training group(n=40),combined drug therapy group(n=75)and comprehensive treatment group(n=68).Parent training group:only parents of children with ADHD were trained.Combined executive function training group:on the basis of parental training,the children with ADHD were given executive function training.Combined drug therapy group:on the basis of parental training,children with ADHD were given Methylphenidate sustained-release tablets(MPH).Comprehensive treatment group:on the basis of parent training,MPH drug therapy and executive function training were combined.The scores of the Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test(IVA-CPT),Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition(WISC-Ⅳ),and the Chinese version of Swanson,Nolan,and Pelham-Ⅳ scale(SNAP-Ⅳ)-parents in 4 groups were compared before and after treatment.Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance(ANOVA),LSD-t test and χ2 test.Results After treatment,the results of IVA-CPT scores showed that the hyperactivity quotient and attention quotient in the combined executive function training group,the combined drug therapy group,and the comprehensive treatment group were significantly higher than those in the parent training group[hyperactivity quotient:(94.38±26.37)points,(94.48±18.02)points,(101.37±15.27)points vs(67.03±16.03)points,F=28.927,P<0.001;attention quotient:(80.08±19.28)points,(82.36±25.32)points,(86.69±20.99)points vs(72.11±26.53)points,F=3.121,P=0.027].The attention quotient in the combined drug therapy group and the comprehensive treatment group was superior to that in the combined executive function training group,with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).After treatment,the results of WISC-IV scores indicated that the verbal comprehension index,perceptual reasoning index,processing speed index,and full-scale intelligence quotient(IQ)in the combined executive function group,the combined drug therapy group,and the comprehensive treatment group were higher than those in the parent training group[verbal comprehension index:(84.90±10.65)points,(89.76±12.80)points,(88.43±10.95)points vs(77.89±10.47)points,F=9.446,P<0.001;perceptual reasoning index:(90.00±12.74)points,(96.52±11.10)points,(99.74±14.42)points vs(84.40±15.00)points,F=12.612,P<0.001;processing speed index:(90.95±10.53)points,(94.09±11.30)points,(95.43±11.03)points vs(82.91±12.45)points,F=10.637,P<0.001;full-scale IQ:(86.80±8.51)points,(92.16±9.36)points,(95.29±10.78)points vs(78.54±9.90)points,F=25.338,P<0.001].Moreover,the above indicators of the combined drug therapy group and the comprehensive treatment group were superior to those of the combined executive function training group(all P<0.05).After treatment,the results of SNAP-IV scores demonstrated that improvements in attention,hyperactivity-impulsivity,and oppositional defiant symptoms in the combined executive function training group,the combined drug therapy group,and the comprehensive treatment group were superior to those in the parent training group[attention:(1.29±0.53)points,(1.15±0.40)points,(1.08±0.51)points vs(2.29±0.49)points,F=57.167,P<0.001;hyperactivity-impulsivity:(1.15±0.49)points,(0.99±0.63)points,(1.01±0.40)points vs(1.51±0.41)points,F=9.633,P<0.001;oppositional defiance:(1.24±0.42)points,(1.00±0.49)points,(0.86±0.50)points vs(1.70±0.33)points,F=28.158,P<0.001].Additionally,the above indicators of the combined drug therapy group and the comprehensive treatment group were superior to those of the combined executive function training group(all P<0.05).Conclusion For children aged 6-9 years with ADHD,comprehensive treatment and MPH drug therapy yielded optimal therapeutic outcomes,whereas executive function training showed moderate effectiveness.As a non-pharmacological intervention,executive function training provides a novel direction for early ADHD management.

关键词

注意缺陷多动障碍/家长培训/综合治疗/药物治疗/执行功能训练

Key words

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder/Parent training/Comprehensive treatment/Drug therapy/Executive function training

引用本文复制引用

朱才荣,江蕙芸,蒙晓梅,沈榕,覃秋萍..不同治疗方案对6~9岁注意缺陷多动障碍患儿疗效的对比研究[J].发育医学电子杂志,2026,14(1):20-27,8.

基金项目

广西壮族自治区卫生健康委科研计划课题(Z-A20230369) (Z-A20230369)

发育医学电子杂志

2095-5340

访问量1
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文