兵工自动化2026，Vol.45Issue(3)：64-67,91,5.DOI:10.7690/bgzdh.2026.03.011
伪攻角三回路自动驾驶仪极点配置策略对比
Comparison of Pole Placement Strategies for Pseudo Angle of Attack Three Loop Autopilot
孔哲 1杨若眉 1赵红刚1
作者信息
- 1. 西安航天动力技术研究所,西安 710025
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
In order to solve the problem that the selection of poles depends too much on engineering experience in the design of autopilot,three pole-placement strategies are proposed.Based on the pole assignment method considering the open-loop cut-off frequency constraint,the analytical expressions of the autopilot parameters under three different pole assignment strategies are derived,and the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy are analyzed.The autopilot response characteristics under three strategies are compared and analyzed through two design examples with different characteristics.The results show that all the three methods can ensure enough stability margin,and the ITAE rule has the fastest response speed,but it has overshoot and single oscillation.The rule with the real pole as the dominant pole can achieve no overshoot in the step response.The phase angle margin is the largest under the concircular rule.关键词
伪攻角反馈/三回路自动驾驶仪/极点配置Key words
pseudo-angle-of-attack feedback/three-loop autopilot/pole assignment分类
军事科技引用本文复制引用
孔哲,杨若眉,赵红刚..伪攻角三回路自动驾驶仪极点配置策略对比[J].兵工自动化,2026,45(3):64-67,91,5.
