农药科学与管理2026，Vol.47Issue(3)：5-8,4.
国际农药残留评估方法替代争议及对中国的启示
Competition Between Traditional and Emerging Methods for International Pesticide Residue Assessment and Its Implications for China
摘要
Abstract
Codex Alimentarius standards on Pesticide Residue are critical for safeguarding global food trade and public health security.Their formulation and revision must rely on globally recognized dietary risk assessment methods.At the 56th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues(CCPR),held in September 2025,the Committee focused on deliberations concerning the proposed replacement of the International Estimated Daily Intake(IEDI)methodology with the Global Estimate of Chronic Dietary Exposure(GECDE)approach.Owing to substantial divergences among member states,the meeting ultimately decided to postpone the implementation of the new method.From the perspective of the Chinese delegation,this paper analyzes the technical characteristics and controversial focuses of the two dietary risk assessment methods,aiming to provide references for China's deeper participation in international rule-making and for improving its capacity in pesticide residue risk management.关键词
膳食暴露评估/农药残留/全球慢性膳食暴露估计值/国际估算每日摄入量/风险评估Key words
dietary exposure assessment/pesticide residues/GECDE/IEDI/risk assessment分类
农业科技引用本文复制引用
李贤宾,陶传江..国际农药残留评估方法替代争议及对中国的启示[J].农药科学与管理,2026,47(3):5-8,4.基金项目
本文为"国家农药残留标准高质量发展与科普行动"系列成果. （）
