数字图书馆论坛2025，Vol.21Issue(12)：59-68,10.DOI:10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2025.12.007
商业出版社与非营利出版社开放出版现状对比研究与启示
Comparative Study of Open Publishing Between Commercial and Non-Profit Publishers and Implications
余慧 1马梧桐 1张藤予 1纪颖茹1
作者信息
- 1. 中国科学技术信息研究所,北京 100038
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the open access movement,a comparative study on the differentiated positioning and practical pathways of commercial publishers and non-profit publishers in the open publishing ecosystem is of great reference value for advancing the construction of China's open access system.This paper takes four commercial publishers(Springer Nature,Wiley,Elsevier,Taylor&Francis)and three major non-profit publishers(PLOS,ACM,IEEE)as research objects.Using web-based research and content analysis,it focuses the study of open publishing on three core dimensions:publishing content,implementation mechanisms,and open access agreements.Based on a multi-dimensional analysis of the current state of open publishing for both types of publishers,this paper conducts a comparative investigation into their differences in open transition speed,attitudes toward the article processing charge(APC)model,and role positioning in the open access movement,so as to reveal the behavioral logic and value orientation of different actors in the open access ecosystem.On this basis,three implications are proposed for China's open publishing practice:promoting the clustering and alliance development of scientific and technical journals to enhance transition agility;exploring diversified open publishing models to reduce dependence on APC;and strengthening top-level design to build a core force for non-profit open publishing.关键词
开放获取/开放出版/商业出版社/非营利出版社Key words
Open Access/Open Publishing/Commercial Publisher/Non-Profit Publisher分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
余慧,马梧桐,张藤予,纪颖茹..商业出版社与非营利出版社开放出版现状对比研究与启示[J].数字图书馆论坛,2025,21(12):59-68,10.
