| 注册
首页|期刊导航|上海中医药杂志|经皮电刺激的分类争议与发展展望

经皮电刺激的分类争议与发展展望

陈婷婷 陈艳焦 徐玉东 杨永清 王宇

上海中医药杂志2026,Vol.60Issue(4):10-16,7.
上海中医药杂志2026,Vol.60Issue(4):10-16,7.DOI:10.16305/j.1007-1334.2026.z20250710005

经皮电刺激的分类争议与发展展望

Classification controversies and development prospects for transcutaneous electrical stimulation

陈婷婷 1陈艳焦 2徐玉东 2杨永清 1王宇1

作者信息

  • 1. 上海市针灸经络研究所(上海 200030)||上海中医药大学(上海 201203)
  • 2. 上海市针灸经络研究所(上海 200030)
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation(TES)technology has become a pivotal tool in pain management,neurological rehabilitation,and functional regulation,attributed to its non-invasiveness and tunability.However,a long-standing controversy persists regarding the classification boundary between its two major subtypes:transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation(TEAS)and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation(TENS).This ambiguous classification not only causes confusion in clinical practice,but also hinders the formulation of standardized treatment protocols,ultimately restricting the extensive clinical application and in-depth advancement of TES technology.This paper thoroughly explores the similarities and differences between TEAS and TENS in terms of theoretical foundations,technical parameters,mechanisms of action,and clinical applications,identifies the contradictions in the current classification system,and proposes an integrated framework.The aim is to provide evidence for the standardized and precise development of TES technology.

关键词

经皮电刺激/经皮穴位电刺激/经皮神经电刺激/分类争议/整合路径/临床应用

Key words

transcutaneous electrical stimulation/transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation/transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation/classification controversy/integration approach/clinical application

引用本文复制引用

陈婷婷,陈艳焦,徐玉东,杨永清,王宇..经皮电刺激的分类争议与发展展望[J].上海中医药杂志,2026,60(4):10-16,7.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金项目(82374583) (82374583)

国家中医药管理局河南邵氏针灸流派传承工作室项目(国中医药人教函[2019]62号) (国中医药人教函[2019]62号)

上海中医药杂志

1007-1334

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文