全球科技经济瞭望2026，Vol.41Issue(1)：26-36,11.DOI:10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2026.01.004
科技项目专家评审信用管理机制国际比较及对中国制度建设的启示
International Comparison of Credit Management Mechanisms in Expert Peer Review for Science and Technology Projects and Implications for Institutional Development in China
马昭 1许芊芊 2宋磊 1冯凌子 2杨晓 3武治印1
作者信息
- 1. 国家卫生健康委医药卫生科技发展研究中心,北京 100044
- 2. 中国科学院文献情报中心,北京 100190||中国科学院大学经济与管理学院,北京 100190
- 3. 北京大学信息管理系,北京 100871
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Expert reviewer credit management is an important institutional foundation for ensuring the fairness and scientific validity of academic evaluation.With the increasing frequency of academic activities and intensifying research competition,concerns about the integrity of peer reviewers have drawn growing attention.This study analyzes the differences in credit management practices for expert review between China and other countries,focusing on expert selection,credit evaluation,factors influencing review quality,and incentive mechanisms.The findings indicate that,in terms of institutional design,international practices have developed a dynamic credit profiling system that integrates quantitative metrics with qualitative assessments.In recent years,China has established a relatively systematic institutional foundation in the construction of expert databases and the management of negative lists.However,it still faces challenges such as fragmented evaluation standards,lack of transparency in review processes,and weak incentive and accountability mechanisms.At the operational level,many countries have leveraged technological tools and process reengineering to mitigate risks of misconduct in peer review.China places greater emphasis on rigid institutional constraints and full-process supervision during the review process.Meanwhile,China needs to enhance its institutional support in areas such as post-review behavior assessment and dynamic conflict-of-interest monitoring.Based on these insights,the study proposes a triadic framework for expert credit management-comprising institutional refinement,technological empowerment,and cultural cultivation-to promote fairness and rigor in academic peer review and advance the construction of a trustworthy research environment.关键词
专家评审/信用管理/差异研究Key words
Expert Peer Review/Credit Management/Comparative Study分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
马昭,许芊芊,宋磊,冯凌子,杨晓,武治印..科技项目专家评审信用管理机制国际比较及对中国制度建设的启示[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2026,41(1):26-36,11.
