摘要
Abstract
The further advancement of systematic protection of intangible cultural heritage(ICH),coupled with the continuous construction of educational and disciplinary systems,has driven ICH research into a critical transformation from inheritance practice to disciplinary institutionalization.Considering the distinct embodied,contextual and fluid attributes of ICH knowledge,how to realize knowledge integration,theoretical abstraction and institutional construction while preserving its living characteristics has become a core issue in the construction of the ICH discipline.The theory of knowledge production modes offers an effective analytical perspective for investigating the process.By sorting out the evolutionary logic of knowledge production modes from Mode Ⅰ to Mode Ⅱ,this paper argues that the key to constructing the ICH discipline lies not in the establishment of disciplinary categories or the demarcation of research objects,but in the adjustment of knowledge generation modes:that is,reshaping the realistic fields of knowledge generation,reconstructing the subject relationships of knowledge production,and redefining the evaluation criteria for knowledge validity.The problem orientation,contextual correlation,cross-border collaboration and social accountability emphasized by Mode Ⅱ are inherently consistent with the operation mode of ICH knowledge—generated in practice,inherited through interaction,and verified in application.This study finds that the current construction of the ICH discipline is confronted with three major dilemmas:disciplinary positioning is still restricted by traditional boundaries;practical subjects have not yet truly entered the core links of knowledge production;and the evaluation system overemphasizes static achievements while ignoring inheritance practice and social benefits.In this regard,this paper proposes promoting the construction of the ICH discipline from three aspects:interdisciplinary positioning,multi-subject collaboration and dynamic comprehensive evaluation,so as to drive its transformation from a relatively closed knowledge production mode to an open knowledge ecosystem that faces reality and is rooted in practice.关键词
知识生产模式/非物质文化遗产/学科建设/逻辑/建设路径Key words
knowledge production mode/intangible cultural heritage/disciplinary development/logic/development path分类
社会科学
