| 注册

论可接受的出生

袁怀瑜

中国医学伦理学2026,Vol.39Issue(5):650-655,6.
中国医学伦理学2026,Vol.39Issue(5):650-655,6.DOI:10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2026.05.13

论可接受的出生

Discussion on acceptable birth

袁怀瑜1

作者信息

  • 1. 西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆 401120
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Benatar's antinatalism argues that being born into the world is always a form of harm,with the asymmetry argument and the quality of life argument as its two pillars.Based on an inadequate understanding of pain,antinatalism pursues complete painlessness.However,modern medicine and psychology provide a more comprehensive account of pain,positing that both physical and psychological pain carry significant value for human beings and should not be entirely rejected.Therefore,proposing a theory of"birth pain threshold"represents a relatively moderate approach to address the moral issue of reproduction.This requires considering from both medical and environmental perspectives to explore under what conditions birth is acceptable.The medical standard includes the assessment of fetal health status through prenatal diagnostic technologies,while the environmental standard involves the material and psychological support required for the fetus after birth.

关键词

功利主义/反出生主义/痛苦

Key words

utilitarianism/antinatalism/pain

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

袁怀瑜..论可接受的出生[J].中国医学伦理学,2026,39(5):650-655,6.

基金项目

2020年度国家社科基金项目"类案同判机制研究"(20XFX001) (20XFX001)

中国医学伦理学

1001-8565

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文