| 注册
首页|期刊导航|灾害学|安全、风险、突发事件、危机与灾害概念研究:进展、局限与未来展望

安全、风险、突发事件、危机与灾害概念研究:进展、局限与未来展望

孔锋 王一飞 雷晓康

灾害学2026,Vol.41Issue(3):11-18,8.
灾害学2026,Vol.41Issue(3):11-18,8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2026.03.002

安全、风险、突发事件、危机与灾害概念研究:进展、局限与未来展望

Research on the Concepts of Safety,Risk,Emergency,Crisis and Disaster:Progress,Limitations and Future Prospects

孔锋 1王一飞 2雷晓康3

作者信息

  • 1. 中国农业大学 人文与发展学院,北京 100083||中国农业大学 北京乡村振兴与城乡融合发展创新中心,北京 100083||清华大学 应急管理研究基地,北京 100084
  • 2. 中国气象局气象干部培训学院,北京 100081
  • 3. 西北大学 公共管理学院,陕西 西安 710127
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Safety,risk,emergency,crisis,and disaster are core concepts in public safety,emergency manage-ment,and disaster governance,with close semantic connections but distinct connotations.Their scientific defini-tion and clear differentiation directly affect theoretical research and practical effectiveness.Amid intensifying global climate change,technological innovation and social restructuring,frequent uncertain events highlight the urgency of studying these concepts.Based on a multi-disciplinary perspective,their research progress is sorted out,current limitations are analyzed,and future directions are clarified to provide reference for theoretical stan-dardization and practical refinement.The research shows that the study of these five concepts has evolved from single-concept definition to multi-concept connection analysis and from theoretical discussion to practical adapta-tion.Specifically,the concept of safety has evolved to system controllability;risk has developed into an integrat-ed paradigm of"hazard×exposure×vulnerability";emergency has a legal definition with clear classification;crisis is regarded as a"system imbalance"process;disaster integrates natural and man-made hazard factors.Academi-cally,a dynamic chain of"safety-risk-emergency-crisis-disaster-safety damage"has been formed,with clear dif-ferences in connotation and application scenarios.Practically,the research is closely linked to China's emergen-cy management system and international standards,enhancing its practical value.However,there are limitations:inconsistent concept definitions,inadequate connection analysis,poor practical adaptability,and single research methods,which restrict research depth and practicality.Future research should focus on safety guarantee,pro-mote concept standardization,deepen connection analysis,strengthen practical orientation,and innovate interdis-ciplinary and quantitative research methods to adapt to the needs of global risk society and emergency manage-ment modernization.This study confirms that standardized definition and systematic differentiation of the five concepts are crucial for emergency management modernization.It provides theoretical support for building a large-scale safety and emergency framework and promoting global risk governance cooperation.

关键词

安全/风险/危机/灾害/突发事件/应急管理

Key words

safety/risk/crisis/disaster/emergency/emergency management

分类

资源环境

引用本文复制引用

孔锋,王一飞,雷晓康..安全、风险、突发事件、危机与灾害概念研究:进展、局限与未来展望[J].灾害学,2026,41(3):11-18,8.

基金项目

2025年度国家社科基金后期资助项目"中国式应急管理现代化建设研究"(25FGLB062) (25FGLB062)

灾害学

1000-811X

访问量1
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文