首页|期刊导航|Journal of Data and Information Science|Can ChatGPT be a Good Follower of Academic Paradigms?Research Quality Evaluations in Conflicting Areas of Sociology

Can ChatGPT be a Good Follower of Academic Paradigms?Research Quality Evaluations in Conflicting Areas of Sociology

Mike Thelwall Ralph Schroeder Meena Dhanda

Journal of Data and Information Science2026，Vol.11Issue(2)：P.154-164,11.

Journal of Data and Information Science2026，Vol.11Issue(2)：P.154-164,11.DOI:10.1515/jdis-2025-0390

Can ChatGPT be a Good Follower of Academic Paradigms?Research Quality Evaluations in Conflicting Areas of Sociology

Mike Thelwall ¹Ralph Schroeder ²Meena Dhanda³

作者信息

1. School of Information,Journalism and Communication,University of Sheffield,Sheffield,UK
2. Oxford Internet Institute,University of Oxford,Oxford,UK
3. Department of Media and Communications,London School of Economics and Political Science,London,UK
折叠

摘要

关键词

paradigms/research evaluation/Large Language Models/sociology/research methods

分类

社会科学

引用本文复制引用

Mike Thelwall,Ralph Schroeder,Meena Dhanda..Can ChatGPT be a Good Follower of Academic Paradigms?Research Quality Evaluations in Conflicting Areas of Sociology[J].Journal of Data and Information Science,2026,11(2):P.154-164,11.

基金项目

funded by the Economic and Social Research Council(ESRC),UK(APP43146). （ESRC）

Journal of Data and Information Science

ISSN：2096-157X

访问量0

下载量0

段落导航