| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国药业|不同脂必泰胶囊方案对比中等强度阿托伐他汀钙方案降脂作用的药物经济学评价

不同脂必泰胶囊方案对比中等强度阿托伐他汀钙方案降脂作用的药物经济学评价

李虔全 刘亭 彭霞 杨建 饶倩 胡闵山

中国药业2026,Vol.35Issue(11):129-136,8.
中国药业2026,Vol.35Issue(11):129-136,8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2026.11.024

不同脂必泰胶囊方案对比中等强度阿托伐他汀钙方案降脂作用的药物经济学评价

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Lipid-Lowering Effects of Different Zhibitai Capsules Regimens Compared with Moderate-Intensity Atorvastatin Calcium

李虔全 1刘亭 1彭霞 1杨建 1饶倩 1胡闵山1

作者信息

  • 1. 四川省巴中市中心医院,四川 巴中 636000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To conduct the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of lipid-lowering effects of different zhibitai capsules regimens compared with moderate-intensity atorvastatin calcium,and to provide a reference for clinical selection of lipid-lowering drugs.Methods A decision tree model was constructed by the TreeAge Pro 2022.2.1 software.With the per capita disposable income of Sichuan Province in 2024(CNY 34 325)as the willingness to pay(WTP)threshold,and with the decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C)(ΔLDL-C)as the effect parameter,a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted on the comparison of the Zhibitai Capsules regimens with the moderate-intensity(10 mg or 20 mg)atorvastatin calcium regimens retrieved from the CNKI,WanFang,VIP,SinoMed,Embase,PubMed,and The Cochrane Library databases.Results Through screening,21 articles were included[involving 22 randomized controlled trials(RCTs)],in which compared two Zhibitai Capsules alone regimens and five Zhibitai Capsules combined with atorvastatin calcium regimens with the moderate-intensity atorvastatin calcium regimens,respectively.The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)analysis showed that the LDL-C of regimen 1[240 mg of Zhibitai Capsules alone,twice daily(bid)]did not decrease compared to the atorvastatin calcium regimen[10 mg,once daily(qd)],indicating an increase in cost.The ICERs for regimen 2[Zhibitai Capsules(alone,480 mg,bid)],regimen 3[Zhibitai Capsules(480 mg,bid)+atorvastatin calcium(10 mg,qd)],regimen 4[Zhibitai Capsules(240 mg,bid)+atorvastatin calcium(10 mg,qd)]compared to the atorvastatin calcium(10 mg,qd)regimen were-CNY 1 514.48,-CNY 806.25,-CNY 889.66,respectively.The ICERs for regimen 5[Zhibitai Capsules(480 mg,bid)+atorvastatin calcium(10 mg,qd)],regimen 6[Zhibitai Capsules(240 mg,bid)+atorvastatin calcium(20 mg,qd)],and regimen 7[Zhibitai Capsules(480 mg,bid)+atorvastatin calcium(20 mg,qd)]compared to the atorvastatin calcium(20 mg,qd)regimen were-CNY 1 766.40,-CNY 422.95,-CNY 3 685.71,respectively.Conclusion In the case of taking the per capita disposable income of Sichuan Province in 2024 as the WTP threshold,except for the use of Zhibitai Capsules(240 mg,bid)alone was not economically viable compared with moderate-intensity atorvastatin calcium(10 mg or 20 mg,qd),the remaining Zhibitai Capsules regimens in the study were all economically viable compared with moderate-intensity atorvastatin calcium regimens.The research regimens were robust in the variable range of key elements.

关键词

脂必泰胶囊/阿托伐他汀钙/成本-效果分析/决策树模型/降脂效果/药物经济性评价

Key words

Zhibitai Capsules/atorvastatin calcium/cost-effectiveness analysis/decision tree model/lipid-lowering effect/pharmacoeconomic evaluation

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李虔全,刘亭,彭霞,杨建,饶倩,胡闵山..不同脂必泰胶囊方案对比中等强度阿托伐他汀钙方案降脂作用的药物经济学评价[J].中国药业,2026,35(11):129-136,8.

中国药业

1006-4931

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文