路基工程Issue(3)：24-31,8.DOI:10.13379/j.issn.1003-8825.202512054
铁路边坡土钉支护的不同设计理念对比分析
Comparative Analysis of Different Design Philosophies for Soil Nailing Support in Railway Slopes
朱雯蕾 1张雪东 1沈宇鹏 2张政 1李岩峰1
作者信息
- 1. 中交铁道设计研究总院有限公司,北京 100088
- 2. 北京交通大学,北京 100044
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Under the context of overseas railway slope soil nailing design,this study conducted a comparative analysis between the European limit state design system and the Chinese hybrid design system(combining safety factor with limit state design).Through systematic code review and case-based numerical analysis,this study systematically elucidated the impacts of these two systems on soil nail forces,structural parameters,and material configurations across four key dimensions:design architecture,verification logic,mechanical modeling,and safety control.The result shows that,the systemic differences between the two design frameworks lead to distinct patterns of structural response and material utilization,thereby influencing design economics.This research finding contributes to a deeper understanding of the conceptual divergences between Chinese and European geotechnical design philosophies.关键词
铁路边坡/土钉支护/规范对比/极限状态设计/分项系数/差异/耐久性Key words
railway slope/soil nailing support/code comparison/limit state design/partial safety factor/difference/durability分类
交通工程引用本文复制引用
朱雯蕾,张雪东,沈宇鹏,张政,李岩峰..铁路边坡土钉支护的不同设计理念对比分析[J].路基工程,2026,(3):24-31,8.
