| 注册
首页|期刊导航|河南农业大学学报|烟叶烘烤阶段不同YOLO算法模型的实时判别性能比较

烟叶烘烤阶段不同YOLO算法模型的实时判别性能比较

马一鸣 聂庆凯 宋朝鹏 吴俊锋 尹爽 郭瑞 周晴 王志华 张雍 王文杰 张浩 朱娟花

河南农业大学学报2026,Vol.60Issue(4):715-725,11.
河南农业大学学报2026,Vol.60Issue(4):715-725,11.DOI:10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.20251104.001

烟叶烘烤阶段不同YOLO算法模型的实时判别性能比较

Optimization and applicability study of the YOLO algorithm for tobacco leaf curing stage discrimination

马一鸣 1聂庆凯 2宋朝鹏 1吴俊锋 3尹爽 2郭瑞 4周晴 3王志华 3张雍 3王文杰 3张浩 3朱娟花3

作者信息

  • 1. 河南农业大学烟草学院,河南 郑州 450046
  • 2. 河南中烟工业有限责任公司,河南 郑州 450016
  • 3. 河南农业大学机电工程学院,河南 郑州 450002
  • 4. 中国烟草总公司河南省公司,河南 郑州 450018
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

[Objective]This study aims to compare and explore the applicability of YOLO algorithm models in the discrimination of tobacco leaf curing stages and identify the optimal version.[Method]Four versions of YOLO,including YOLOv3,YOLOv5s,YOLOv8s,and YOLOv11s,were selected to construct models respectively.These models were compared and evaluated based on three aspects:dis-crimination performance,complexity,and real-time detection ability.[Result]The YOLOv8s model performed better overall than the other three versions,with an precision of 95.0%,an average accu-racy value of 97.1%,and an F1 score of 93.0%,all of which were the best among the models.The model's recall rate was 91.1%,which was slightly lower than the YOLOv5s model's 93.3%.Addition-ally,the YOLOv8s algorithm demonstrated the fastest detection speed,with a detection time of only 5.5 ms per image.Notably,the YOLOv8s algorithm model showed outstanding performance in classi-fying stages with subtle changes in tobacco leaf condition,such as the stem drying stage.In terms of lightweight design,YOLOv5s performed the best,with a parameter count of 7.04×106,a computa-tional load of 15.8 G FLOPs,and a model size of 13.7 MB.Under comparable power consumption levels across all four models,the YOLOv5s model required 1 081 MB of runtime memory,only slightly higher than the 916 MB required by the YOLOv8s model.[Conclusion]Through comparative analysis,significant differences were observed in the performance of the four YOLO algorithm versions in dis-criminating tobacco leaf curing stages,with YOLOv5s and YOLOv8s performing better.YOLOv8s exhibited the best overall performance,while YOLOv5s had lower computational load and model size,making it more suitable for low-cost embedded devices requiring lightweight models.Therefore,YOLO algorithm models are suitable for real-time discrimination of tobacco leaf curing stages,and the version selection should be based on specific needs.

关键词

烟叶烘烤/阶段判别/YOLO算法/实时判别/图像处理

Key words

tobacco leaf curing/stage discrimination/YOLO algorithm/real-time discrimination/image processing

分类

农业科技

引用本文复制引用

马一鸣,聂庆凯,宋朝鹏,吴俊锋,尹爽,郭瑞,周晴,王志华,张雍,王文杰,张浩,朱娟花..烟叶烘烤阶段不同YOLO算法模型的实时判别性能比较[J].河南农业大学学报,2026,60(4):715-725,11.

基金项目

中国烟草总公司科技项目(国烟科[2021]55号) (国烟科[2021]55号)

河南省科技攻关项目(232102110303) (232102110303)

河南农业大学学报

1000-2340

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文