| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国全科医学|子宫内膜异位症疼痛管理相关指南和专家共识的系统评价

子宫内膜异位症疼痛管理相关指南和专家共识的系统评价

谢婉 涂旭莲 吴丽萍 刘霞 李晓燕 冷明月 杨雪青 李莉

中国全科医学2026,Vol.29Issue(23):3351-3358,8.
中国全科医学2026,Vol.29Issue(23):3351-3358,8.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0016

子宫内膜异位症疼痛管理相关指南和专家共识的系统评价

A Systematic Review of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Related to Pain Management in Endometriosis

谢婉 1涂旭莲 2吴丽萍 1刘霞 2李晓燕 2冷明月 2杨雪青 2李莉2

作者信息

  • 1. 100144 北京市,中国医学科学院北京协和医学院护理学院
  • 2. 100730 北京市,女性健康与妇产疾病国家临床医学研究中心 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 北京协和医院妇产科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Background As the understanding of pain management in endometriosis deepens,an increasing number of related guidelines and expert consensus have emerged both domestically and internationally,providing significant guidance and reference for clinical practice.However,the quality of these guidelines and expert consensuses is inconsistent,necessitating a systematic review to guide clinical practice.Objective To systematically evaluate the quality of guidelines and expert consensus related to pain management in endometriosis,thereby providing an evidence base for the development of pain management protocols.Methods Evidence-based guidelines involving recommendations for pain management in endometriosis were searched in CNKI,SinoMed,Wanfang Data,VIP,PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CINAHL,Guideline Central,GIN,as well as the official websites of ACOG,NICE,SIGN,WHO,IASP,APS and BPS,and other sources from inception to 12 November,2024.AGREEⅡ was utilized to assess the quality of guidelines and expert consensus related to pain management in endometriosis,and relevant recommendations were summarized.Results A total of 15 guidelines/expert consensus were ultimately included,of which 9 were guidelines and 6 were expert consensuses.7 guidelines/expert consensus were from China,and 8 were from abroad.The publication dates ranged from 2018 to 2024.Among the 6 domains of AGREE Ⅱ,the average scores of the 15 guidelines/expert consensuses were as follows:scope and purpose(83.15%),stakeholder involvement(71.11%),rigor of development(44.79%),clarity of presentation(65.74%),applicability(35.55%),editorial independence(87.78%).33 recommendations were extracted and summarized from 15 guidelines/expert consensus,involving 6 domains,namely general principles of pain management,pain assessment,medication management,surgical management,non-pharmacologic/surgical management,health education.Conclusion The quality of the included guideli`nes/expert consensus is at a moderate level and provides a reference point for clinical practice,but further improvement is needed in the areas of the rigour of development and applicability.

关键词

子宫内膜异位症/疼痛/管理/指南/专家共识/质量评价

Key words

Endometriosis/Pain/Management/Guideline/Expert consensus/Quality appraisal

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

谢婉,涂旭莲,吴丽萍,刘霞,李晓燕,冷明月,杨雪青,李莉..子宫内膜异位症疼痛管理相关指南和专家共识的系统评价[J].中国全科医学,2026,29(23):3351-3358,8.

基金项目

国家重点研发计划(2022YFC2704000) (2022YFC2704000)

中央高水平医院临床科研业务费资助(2022-PUMCH-B-085) (2022-PUMCH-B-085)

2025年度北京协和医学院护理学院科研项目(PUMCSON202508) (PUMCSON202508)

中国全科医学

1007-9572

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文