| 注册
首页|期刊导航|标准化学报|法庭科学/司法鉴定标准的质量评价研究

法庭科学/司法鉴定标准的质量评价研究

张洺睿 王旭

标准化学报Issue(7):6-16,11.
✕
标准化学报Issue(7):6-16,11.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-857X.2026.07.001

法庭科学/司法鉴定标准的质量评价研究

Research on Quality Assessment of Forensic Science Standards:A MATLAB-based Data Analysis Approach

张洺睿 1王旭2

作者信息

  • 1. 中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室||中国政法大学刑事检察研究基地(证据分析)||北京市昌平区人民法院
  • 2. 中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室||中国政法大学刑事检察研究基地(证据分析)||法大法庭科学技术鉴定研究所
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

[Objective]The study aims to construct a quantitative evaluation system for forensic science standards,providing quantitative decision-making support to enhance the scientific validity,normative consistency,and applicability of standard development.[Methods]Based on the statistical analysis of 108 current national standards in China,an evaluation system was constructed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP),comprising three criteria(content quality,implementation benefits,and implementation status)and eight indicators.A standard evaluation tool was developed using MATLAB to empirically evaluate 60 representative national and industry standards,combined with Python cluster analysis to mine data characteristics.[Results]Results indicate that the overall quality of national standards outperforms that of industry standards.Standards released in 2024 achieved an average comprehensive score of 9.1,significantly higher than older standards.However,issues such as aging standards,incomplete systemic coverage,and low implementation benefits persist.Cluster analysis stratified standards into high-quality,intermediate,and low-quality groups,revealing an insufficient supply of basic and management-related standards.[Conclusion]It is recommended to improve the full-lifecycle dynamic management of standards by leveraging the Standardization Law of China,and to establish a"5-year mandatory review+3-year dynamic monitoring"mechanism.The evaluation process should be standardized,and the indicator system dynamically optimized.Furthermore,evaluation efficiency should be enhanced through digital platforms and international collaboration to address structural imbalances in the standards system,ultimately driving the transformation of forensic science standardization from an"experiential paradigm"to a"scientific empirical paradigm".

关键词

法庭科学/司法鉴定/标准/质量评价

Key words

forensic science/judicial expertise/standards/quality assessment

引用本文复制引用

张洺睿,王旭..法庭科学/司法鉴定标准的质量评价研究[J].标准化学报,2026,(7):6-16,11.

基金项目

本文受国家社会科学基金重点项目"'技管结合'的现代司法鉴定制度法治化重塑研究"(项目编号:202525AFX014)资助. (项目编号:202525AFX014)

标准化学报

1674-5698

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文