| 注册
首页|期刊导航|解放军医学杂志|全胸腔镜肋骨骨折复位内固定术与传统开放外固定术治疗多发肋骨骨折的疗效比较

全胸腔镜肋骨骨折复位内固定术与传统开放外固定术治疗多发肋骨骨折的疗效比较

孙清宇 林致远 金璐明 卜梁 苏晓霞 陈朝阳 黄立鹏 余之晨 王超 张奕 林照峰 蔡华新

解放军医学杂志2026,Vol.51Issue(7):1056-1060,5.
✕
解放军医学杂志2026,Vol.51Issue(7):1056-1060,5.DOI:10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.1377.2026.0602

全胸腔镜肋骨骨折复位内固定术与传统开放外固定术治疗多发肋骨骨折的疗效比较

Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of totally thoracoscopic rib fracture reduction and internal fixation vs.traditional open external fixation for multiple rib fractures

孙清宇 1林致远 2金璐明 1卜梁 2苏晓霞 1陈朝阳 1黄立鹏 1余之晨 1王超 1张奕 3林照峰 4蔡华新5

作者信息

  • 1. 厦门大学附属翔安医院胸外科,福建 厦门 361005
  • 2. 厦门大学医学院,福建 厦门 361100
  • 3. 福建医科大学附属漳州市医院胸外科,福建 漳州 363000
  • 4. 泉州市中医院外科,福建 泉州 362000
  • 5. 南安市医院胸外科,福建 泉州 362300
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy of multicenter totally thoracoscopic reduction and internal fixation vs.traditional open external fixation in the treatment of multiple rib fractures.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 120 patients with multiple rib fractures from 4 medical institutions between December 2020 and June 2024.According to the different surgical procedures,the patients were divided into totally thoracoscopic group(treated with totally thoracoscopic reduction and internal fixation for rib fractures,n=60)and open group(treated with traditional open external fixation,n=60).The incision length,operation duration,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage time,postoperative hospital stay,and incidence of postoperative complications were analyzed and compared between the two groups.Results Compared with open group,totally thoracoscopic group had significantly shorter incision length,less intraoperative blood loss,as well as shorter operative duration,postoperative drainage time,and postoperative hospital stay(P<0.05).The operative durations for anterior and posterior rib fractures in total thoracoscopic group were both significantly shorter than those in open group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).However,there were no statistically significant differences in the operative durations for lateral rib fractures,the incidence of complications,including poor fixation of the rib embracing fixator,poor fracture healing,and other adverse events between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Compared with traditional open external fixation,totally thoracoscopic reduction and internal fixation for rib fractures has the advantages of minimal trauma,less bleeding,faster recovery,and higher success rate in the treatment of multiple rib fractures.It is particularly suitable for the treatment of anterior and posterior rib fractures,and allows simultaneous management of concomitant intrathoracic injuries.

关键词

多发肋骨骨折/全胸腔镜肋骨骨折复位内固定术/传统开放外固定术/肋骨环抱器

Key words

multiple rib fractures/totally thoracoscopic rib fracture reduction and internal fixation/traditional open external fixation/rib embracing fixator

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

孙清宇,林致远,金璐明,卜梁,苏晓霞,陈朝阳,黄立鹏,余之晨,王超,张奕,林照峰,蔡华新..全胸腔镜肋骨骨折复位内固定术与传统开放外固定术治疗多发肋骨骨折的疗效比较[J].解放军医学杂志,2026,51(7):1056-1060,5.

基金项目

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Guidance Project of Social Development in Fujian Province(2021D016),the Medical and Health Guidance Project of Xiamen City(3502Z20214ZD1136),and the Medicine-Engineering Integration Guidance Project of Xiamen City(3502Z20244ZD2033) 福建省社会发展科技引导性项目(2021D016) (2021D016)

厦门市医疗卫生指导性项目(3502Z20214ZD1136) (3502Z20214ZD1136)

厦门市医工结合指导性项目(3502Z20244ZD2033) (3502Z20244ZD2033)

解放军医学杂志

0577-7402

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文