| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国司法鉴定|环境检察公益诉讼中的专家意见:实践检视与运用路径

环境检察公益诉讼中的专家意见:实践检视与运用路径

杨雅妮 石芬琴

中国司法鉴定Issue(4):39-47,9.
✕
中国司法鉴定Issue(4):39-47,9.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2026.04.005

环境检察公益诉讼中的专家意见:实践检视与运用路径

Expert Opinions in Environmental Prosecutorial Public Interest Litigation:Practical Review and Application Pathways

杨雅妮 1石芬琴1

作者信息

  • 1. 兰州大学 法学院,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

As a new type of evidence stipulated in the Rules for the Handling of Public Interest Litigation Cases by People's Procuratorates,the use of expert opinions helps address the difficulties in proving specialized issues in environmental prosecutorial public interest litigation,and can effectively overcome the limitations of judicial cognition and compensate for the lack of professional knowledge in judicial personnel.Empirical analysis shows that the use of expert opinions in environmental prosecutorial public interest litigation has problems such as inconsistent presentation forms of expert opinions,prominent combined use with appraisal opinions,differences in the identities,types,and sources of experts,and low rate of expert appearance in court for cross-examination.To regulate the use of expert opinions and improve their probative power,regulation should be improved from the following aspects:clarifying the relationship between expert opinions and expert assistants'opinions,defining the order of application between expert opinions and appraisal opinions,unifying the criteria for expert selection,and improving the safeguard mechanisms for expert appearance and cross-examination in court,so as to better serve the practice of prosecutorial public interest litigation.

关键词

专家意见/检察公益诉讼/环境公益诉讼/专家辅助人

Key words

expert opinion/prosecutorial public interest litigation/environmental public interest litigation/expert assistant

分类

社会科学

引用本文复制引用

杨雅妮,石芬琴..环境检察公益诉讼中的专家意见:实践检视与运用路径[J].中国司法鉴定,2026,(4):39-47,9.

基金项目

2025年度司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目重点课题(25SFB1012). (25SFB1012)

中国司法鉴定

1671-2072

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文