中国全科医学2026，Vol.29Issue(30)：4503-4512,10.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0102
抗生素骨水泥联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足有效性和安全性的Meta分析
Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotic Bone Cement Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage for Diabetic Foot:a Meta-analysis
摘要
Abstract
Background Diabetic foot ulcers(DFU)represent prevalent chronic wounds with significant negative impacts on patients'health and socioeconomic status.Antibiotic bone cement(ABC)has emerged as a therapeutic option,though its efficacy and safety require comprehensive evaluation.Objective To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCT)assessing the efficacy and safety of ABC for DFU,thereby providing evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.Methods We systematically searched CNKI,Wanfang Data,VIP,China Biomedical Literature Database,PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,and Web of Science for RCT published until January 2025.Thirteen RCT involving 843 patients were included.The intervention group received ABC combined with vacuum sealing drainage(VSD),while controls received VSD alone.Outcomes included wound healing time,clinical efficacy rate,bacterial clearance time,hospital stay,surgical frequency,amputation rate,visual analogue scale(VAS)scores,and adverse events.RevMan 5.3 was used with random-effects models for heterogeneous data.Results The meta-analysis demonstrated that combined ABC therapy significantly:reduced wound healing time(MD=-14.46,95%CI=-19.69 to-9.23;P<0.05),increased clinical efficacy rates(OR=7.81,95%CI=3.94 to 17.48,P<0.05),shortened bacterial clearance time(MD=-4.04,95%CI=-5.13 to-2.94,P<0.05),decreased positive bacterial cultures at 1-week post-treatment(OR=0.27,95%CI=0.14 to 0.50,P<0.05),lowered amputation rates(OR=0.14,95%CI=0.03 to 0.62,P=0.01),reduced surgical frequency(MD=-1.77,95%CI=-2.52 to-1.03,P<0.05);decreased VAS scores(MD=-1.96,95%CI=-2.35 to-0.57,P<0.05).Additionally,no adverse events were reported across the included studies.For wound healing time,it was divided into Wagner 5 group and non-Wagner 5 group according to different research subjects,and divided into combination group and monotherapy group according to different types of antibiotics.The results of the non-Wagner 5 group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could significantly shorten the wound healing time of DFU patients compared with VSD treatment alone(MD=-6.31,95%CI=-7.88 to-4.74,P<0.05);The results of the Wagner grade 5 group showed that there was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(MD=-8.02,95%CI=-20.11 to 4.07,P=0.19).The results of the antibiotic alone group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could shorten the wound healing time of DFU patients compared with VSD alone(MD=-4.52,95%CI=-5.81 to-3.23,P<0.05).The results of the combination antibiotic group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could significantly shorten the wound healing time of DFU patients compared with VSD alone(MD=-14.21,95%CI=-18.20 to-10.21,P<0.05).For the length of hospitalization,according to the age of the study subjects,they were divided into the average age greater than 60 years old group and the average age less than 60 years group.The results of the mean age group greater than 60 years showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could shorten the hospital stay of DFU patients compared with VSD treatment alone(MD=-6.82,95%CI=-10.93 to-2.71,P=0.001).The results of the average age less than 60 years old group showed that there was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(MD=-5.11,95%CI=-17.78 to 7.56,P=0.45).For the number of surgeries,according to the wound treatment methods,it is divided into a group with skin graft and a group without skin grafting.The results of the no skin graft group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could reduce the number of surgeries in DFU patients compared with VSD treatment alone(MD=-1.79,95%CI=-2.13 to-1.46,P<0.05).The results of the skin graft group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could significantly reduce the number of surgeries in patients with DFU compared with VSD treatment alone(MD=-1.89,95%CI=-3.27 to-0.50,P=0.008).Sensitivity analysis was performed and the results of this study were found.Conclusion In this study,ABC combined with VSD is a safe and effective therapy for DFU,especially for non-Wagner grade 5 patients and the elderly,and the combination of antibiotics and skin grafting can further enhance the efficacy.关键词
糖尿病足/足溃疡,糖尿病性/骨水泥成形术/抗生素骨水泥/负压伤口疗法/负压封闭引流/创面愈合/Meta分析Key words
Diabetic foot/Foot ulcer,diabetic/Cementoplasty/Antibiotic bone cements/Negative-pressure wound therapy/Vaccum sealing drainage/Wound healing/Meta-analysis分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
郭治宏,陈盈盈,刘德伍..抗生素骨水泥联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J].中国全科医学,2026,29(30):4503-4512,10.基金项目
国家自然科学基金资助项目(82460447) （82460447）
