| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国体外生命支持|高出血风险维持性血液透析患者不同抗凝策略对体外循环凝血及出血事件的影响

高出血风险维持性血液透析患者不同抗凝策略对体外循环凝血及出血事件的影响

刘文琴 曹钰琴 雷丽 邹勤 王明初

中国体外生命支持2026,Vol.24Issue(4):313-320,8.
✕
中国体外生命支持2026,Vol.24Issue(4):313-320,8.DOI:10.13498/j.cnki.chin.j.ecls.2026.04.08

高出血风险维持性血液透析患者不同抗凝策略对体外循环凝血及出血事件的影响

Impact of Different Anticoagulation Strategies on Extracorporeal Circuit Clotting and Bleeding Events in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients at High Risk of Bleeding

刘文琴 1曹钰琴 1雷丽 1邹勤 1王明初1

作者信息

  • 1. 泸州市人民医院肾内科,四川 泸州 646000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effects of different extracorporeal anticoagulation strategies on circuit clotting control and bleeding safety in maintenance hemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding,and to provide evidence for individu-alized anticoagulation management.Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled 62 maintenance hemodialysis patients at high bleeding risk from January 2022 to January 2025.According to the anticoagulation strategy used during dialysis,patients were assigned to a heparin-free group(n=21),a low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin(LMWH)group(n=20),and a region-al citrate anticoagulation(RCA)group(n=21).Changes in extracorporeal circuit pressure,dialyzer clotting grade,premature circuit clotting,coagulation activation biomarkers,and bleeding events were compared among the three groups.Results Base-line characteristics were comparable among the three groups(all P>0.05).The increase in transmembrane pressure(TMP)was significantly lower in the RCA group than in the low-dose LMWH and heparin-free groups[(18.7±6.4)mmHg vs.(27.9±9.7)mmHg and(41.3±12.8)mmHg,P<0.001].The incidence of premature circuit clotting decreased from the heparin-free group to the low-dose LMWH group and RCA group[38.10%(8/21),20.00%(4/20),and 9.52%(2/21),respectively;P=0.027 for trend].Post-dialysis levels of thrombomodulin,plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex,thrombin-antithrombin complex,and tissue-type plasminogen activator-inhibitor complex showed a graded pattern,with the lowest levels in the RCA group,intermediate levels in the low-dose LMWH group,and the highest levels in the heparin-free group,and the between-group differences were statis-tically significant(all P<0.05).A total of 16 bleeding events occurred,including 5 major bleeding events(8.06%),8 clinically relevant non-major bleeding(CRNMB)events(12.90%),and 3 minor bleeding events(4.84%).The rate of major bleeding did not differ significantly among the groups(P=0.829),whereas the incidence of CRNMB decreased from the heparin-free group to the low-dose LMWH group and RCA group(23.81%,15.00%,and 0%,respectively;P=0.021 for trend).Multivariate logistic regression showed that heparin-free dialysis(OR=2.88,95%CI:1.11-7.43,P=0.029)and TMP elevation(OR=1.07,95%CI:1.02-1.13,P=0.008)were independently associated with premature circuit clotting.Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the RCA group had the longest circuit patency time(P=0.014).Conclusion In maintenance hemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding,RCA was more effective than heparin-free dialysis and low-dose LMWH in maintaining extracorporeal circuit patency,attenuating TMP elevation,and reducing premature circuit clotting,without increasing major bleeding events.Heparin-free dial-ysis avoided systemic anticoagulant exposure but was associated with a higher risk of circuit clotting,whereas low-dose LMWH showed an intermediate efficacy-safety profile.RCA may represent a safe and effective individualized anticoagulation strategy for this high-risk population.

关键词

高出血风险/维持性血液透析/体外循环/局部枸橼酸抗凝/凝血状态/出血事件

Key words

high bleeding risk/maintenance hemodialysis/extracorporeal circulation/regional citrate anticoagulation/coagulation status/bleeding events

引用本文复制引用

刘文琴,曹钰琴,雷丽,邹勤,王明初..高出血风险维持性血液透析患者不同抗凝策略对体外循环凝血及出血事件的影响[J].中国体外生命支持,2026,24(4):313-320,8.

中国体外生命支持

1672-1403

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文