|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|重庆高教研究|理性、性理与全面理性:中西融通的高等教育话语及观念

理性、性理与全面理性:中西融通的高等教育话语及观念OACHSSCD

中文摘要英文摘要

高等教育学中国话语体系的构建与中国式高等教育现代化道路探索,是知与行的一体两面,是教育理念与教育实践的相互融通.绵绵不绝的中华文明为中国高等教育思想和实践探索提供了广阔空间与强劲动力,然而在西方术语、概念和范畴成为现代高等教育"原型化理论"的背景下,由于中国高等教育的理论、思想不贯通,以及学界对中国高等教育本土经验的总结有限,中国高等教育理论还难以实现高等教育精神上的独立自主.高等教育话语体系构建需要中西文明互鉴下的文明自觉,需要在漫长的文明历史中(不能仅限于近现代历史)来诠释中国高等教育精神的自觉,回答高等教育"宅兹中国""何以中国",从而构建中国文化的主体性自觉.中国高等教育话语体系的构建要能辨识西方高等教育话语体系的哲学基础及其文明根性,需要实现方法论、思想语境的转变,即要以能判定"本体论—形而上学"的道(体)论为思想框架,以道用不离的思维评判西方高等教育知识与价值两离的本体论.基于古老文明返本开新的高等教育话语体系构建和自我主张,需要坚持文明比对、文明融通和领悟文明的"文明 自觉".通过对高等教育核心术语的逻辑学与语用学规范的进一步分析发现,中国高等教育传统话语和高等教育核心术语具有统摄性、文明根性、时代性和交互性等多重特征.西方高等教育的"理性"话语对中国高等教育的"性理"话语造成巨大冲击,理性话语的中西融合是构建全面理性话语的一条思路.而高等教育的异化现象表明,高等教育话语权需要进行现代性批判,促使高等教育主体话语权的回归,从而为高等教育话语体系的构建赋予新动力.中华文明实践蕴藏着丰富的高等教育的价值认同与思想遗产,它们包括却不限于"中和位育"的高等教育目的论、"修身齐家治国平天下"的高等教育政治哲学以及"兼容并蓄"的高等教育学术精神.

The construction of the Chinese discourse system of higher education and the exploration of modernization of Chinese higher education's road are the integration of knowledge and practice,and the integration of educational ideas and educational practices.Prosperous Chinese civilization provides a broad space and strong impetus for the exploration of Chinese higher education ideas and practices.However,at present,when Western terms,concepts and categories have become the"prototype theory"of modern higher education,with the inconsistence of the theories and ideas of Chinese higher education and limited summary of the experience of Chinese higher education,it is difficult to achieve the spiritual independence of higher education theories.The construction of the discourse system of higher education requires the con-sciousness of civilization under the mutual learning of Chinese and Western civilizations.This kind of con-sciousness is to interpret the spirit of Chinese higher education in the long history of civilization(not limited to the short period in modern times),to answer the question of"living in China"and"why it is China"of higher education,so as to build the consciousness of the subjectivity of Chinese culture.In order to iden-tify the philosophical basis and civilization root of the western higher education discourse system,the con-struction of Chinese higher education discourse system needs to take the Tao(body)theory as the ideolog-ical framework to classify subjective ontology-metaphysical,and use the integrational thinking to classify the ontology of Western higher education which is separate from knowledge and value,which is a change of methodology and ideological circumstance.The construction and self-assertion of a new discourse system of higher education based on the return of ancient civilization need to adhere to the"civilization conscious-ness"of civilization's exploration,integration and understanding of civilization.By further analysis of the logic and pragmatics norms of the core terms of higher education,it can be found that the core terms of higher education have the characteristics of control,civilization root,times and interactivity.The"rational"discourse of Western higher education has caused a great impact on the"nature and principle"discourse of Chinese higher education.Through the combination of Chinese and Western rational discourse,a compre-hensive rational discourse or a train of thought is constructed.The dissimilation of higher education shows the necessity of criticizing the"discourse power"of higher education.The return of the discourse power of the subject of higher education can inject strong impetus into the construction of the discourse system of higher education.The practice of Chinese civilization reveals the value identity and ideological heritage of higher education,including but not limited to the theory of"neutral education",the higher education po-litical philosophy of"reaching out to the world"and the academic spirit of"inclusiveness".

单可

浙江师范大学教育学院

教育学

中国高等教育话语体系高等教育核心术语高等教育文明自觉

Chinese higher education discourse systemcore terms of higher educationcivilizational consciousness of higher education

《重庆高教研究》 2024 (001)

22-25 / 4

教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"学术资本风险及其管控策略研究"(23YJA880002)

10.15998/j.cnki.issn1673-8012.2024.01.003

评论