|国家科技期刊平台

南亚研究的区域视野OACHSSCD

Regional Perspectives in South Asian Studies

中文摘要英文摘要

文章回顾了南亚研究的区域视野.前独立时代的印度思想家有意识地将南亚的命运与整个亚洲紧密地联系在一起.法国人类学家杜蒙的种姓研究及其遭遇的批评,反映了欧美学者的区域比较视野和南亚本土学者"就南亚论南亚"的倾向.尽管南亚"庶民研究"价值巨大,但基本丧失了区域视野.南亚研究的突出特色在于其"区域"想象,以及这种想象的区域转换.失去区域视野的本土研究将不得不认可"西方谈普遍,非西方谈特殊"的学术分工.中国的区域国别学特别需要从南亚研究中吸取教训,坚持广阔的区域视野.

In this article,the author reviews the regional perspective of South Asian research.Indian thinkers in the colonial period consciously linked the fate of South Asia closely to the entire Asia.French Anthropologist Louis Dumont's research on caste and criticisms encountered reflect the regional comparative perspective of European and American schol-ars and the tendency of local South Asian scholars to discuss South Asia on its own.Although the"subaltern studies"in South Asia has enormous value,it has basically lost its regional perspective.The prominent feature of South Asian re-search lies in its"regional"imagination and the regional transformation of this imagination.Local research that loses its regional perspective will have to acknowledge the academic division of labor that emphasizes the universality of Western discourse and the uniqueness of non-Western discourse.China's regional ethnography needs to draw lessons from South Asian studies and adhere to a broad regional perspective.

梁永佳

浙江大学 社会学系,浙江 杭州 310058

社会学

南亚区域视野种姓"庶民研究"

South AsianRegional PerspectiveCaste"Subaltern Studies"

《北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2024 (001)

108-118 / 11

浙江大学重要国家和区域研究专项"印度和印尼的国族建设比较研究"(2022SKY5231050002)

10.20076/j.cnki.64-1065/G4.2024.01.010

评论