国际石油公司液化天然气资源池分析及对中国公司的启示OACHSSCDCSTPCD
Analysis of LNG resource portfolio of international oil companies and inspiration for Chinese companies
以壳牌、道达尔能源、bp公司为代表的国际石油公司在LNG资源池建设方面拥有数十年的丰富经验.对比分析中国三大石油公司LNG资源池的特点和短板.中国石油企业LNG资源池的整体规模差距大,产业链上薄弱环节多,抵御市场波动能力弱;资源池增长节奏各有特点,规模差距明显;资源池结构灵活性较弱,多元化和均衡化不足,不利于分散风险;资源池经济性相对较弱.中国企业产生这些短板的原因包括:立足的市场和目标不同等多因素造成产业链布局上的劣势;资源池增长节奏不够平稳;对于资源结构优化的重视不足;上游短板和对时机的把握不足.中国油气企业应实现产业链各环节协调发展,以多种方式实现资源池规模的稳步扩张,进一步优化资源池结构,通过有效方式提高资源池的经济性.
International oil companies represented by Shell,Total Energies,and bp have decades of experience in the LNG resource portfolio.This paper analyzes the characteristics and weaknesses of the LNG resource portfolio China's three major oil companies compared with international oil companies.The overall scale of LNG resource portfolio of Chinese oil companies has a big gap with many weak links in the industry chain and a weak ability to withstand market fluctuations,the pace of growth of LNG resource portfolio distinctive with significant disparities in size,the resource pools have a weak structural flexibility,insufficient diversification and equalization,which is not conducive to diversification of risks,and the resource pools are relatively weak in terms of economics.The reasons for these weaknesses include that weaknesses in the value chain layout caused by multiple factors such as positioning in different markets and goals,the pace of portfolio growth is not smooth enough,insufficient attention to optimizing the resource structure,and weaknesses in upstream and inadequate timing control.The paper proposes that Chinese oil and gas enterprises should achieve coordinated development of all links in the LNG value chain,steadily expand the scale of LNG portfolios by various ways,further optimize the structure of LNG portfolios,and improve the economics of LNG resource portfolios in an effective manner.
张清云;王丹旭;刘潇潇;孔欣怡
中国石油化工集团有限公司国际合作部中国石化经济技术研究院产业发展研究所
LNG资源池壳牌道达尔能源bp多元化经济性中国石油企业
LNG resource portfolioShellTotal EnergiesbpdiversityeconomyChinese oil enterprises
《国际石油经济》 2024 (003)
77-86 / 10
评论