|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国人口·资源与环境|论中国碳市场不良资产的表现与法治应对

论中国碳市场不良资产的表现与法治应对OA北大核心CSTPCD

Performance and legal response of non-performing assets in China's carbon market

中文摘要英文摘要

碳市场的不良资产代表了碳信用与交易预期落空的不良结果,存在基础不良资产、直接不良资产与进阶不良资产三种表现,拥有亏空价值虚拟性、成因复杂性等特征,对应形成干扰市场交易、阻碍低碳减排的双重危害.基于此,该研究采用规范分析、案例调研等方法,全面分析了碳市场不良资产的定性与法治约束现状,并尝试总结碳市场不良资产规制的理念要义与法治改革措施.研究发现:在不良碳资产的定性上,相应法律缺乏识别对应碳资产不良化的自觉,亦不具备界定其内容与范围的实践.在不良碳资产的预防上,已有的法治安排难以克服企业经营不当、市场环境不佳、虚假承诺与市场投机行为等导致资产不良化的负面因素.在不良碳资产的处置上,现行法律不仅在处置主体、处置内容、处置程序与处置救济领域存在规范空白,仅有的关联尝试亦未契合碳市场不良资产消化的经济规律.因此,有必要着眼于不良碳资产形成与消除的逻辑脉络:在理念层面,一是应推崇透明的竞争观,尽可能消除信息不对称所带来的非正义.二是需要破解利益博弈的"囚徒困境",充分提振碳市场维持运行的信心、保持信息的顺畅流通、改变碳减排交易的利益总量预设,引导企业积极参与碳市场活动.三是应尽可能缩小承诺兑现的利益差距,避免价值泡沫的形成.在实践层面,一是应在规则与实践中明晰碳市场不良资产的属性、内容与影响.二是应形成预防不良碳资产累积的全面规制体系.三是需要以一体化思维应对碳市场不良资产的处置问题.

The non-performing assets in the carbon market represent the negative consequences of the loss of carbon credit and the failure of trading expectations.There are three manifestations:basic non-performing assets,direct non-performing assets,and advanced non-performing assets.They have characteristics such as the virtual value of the deficit and the complexity of the causes,corresponding to the dual harm of interfering with market transactions and hindering low-carbon emissions reduction.Based on this,this article adopt-ed methods such as normative analysis and case studies to comprehensively analyze the qualitative and legal constraints of non-perform-ing assets in the carbon market and attempted to summarize the conceptual essence and legal reform measures of regulating non-per-forming assets in the carbon market.Through systematic research,this study found that,in terms of the qualitative analysis of non-per-forming carbon assets,the corresponding laws lacked the awareness to identify the corresponding non-performing carbon assets and did not have the practice to define their content and scope.In terms of preventing non-performing carbon assets,existing legal arrangements made it difficult to overcome negative factors such as improper business operations,a poor market environment,false promises,and mar-ket speculation that could lead to non-performing assets.In terms of the disposal of non-performing carbon assets,current laws had regu-latory gaps in the fields of disposal subjects,disposal content,disposal procedures,and disposal remedies,and the only related attempts failed to conform to the economic laws of non-performing asset digestion in the carbon market.Therefore,reformers need to focus on the logical context of the formation and elimination of non-performing carbon assets.At the conceptual level,firstly,a transparent competi-tion concept should be advocated to eliminate the injustice caused by information asymmetry as much as possible.Secondly,it is neces-sary to break the prisoner's dilemma of the game of interests;reformers need to fully boost confidence in maintaining the operation of the carbon market,maintain the smooth flow of information,change the preset total benefits of carbon emission reduction transactions,and guide enterprises to actively participate in carbon market activities.Finally,reformers should try their best to narrow the interest gap in fulfilling commitments and avoid the formation of a value foam.At the practical level,firstly,the attributes,content,and impact of non-performing assets in the carbon market should be clearly defined in rules and practices.Secondly,a comprehensive regulatory system should be established to prevent the accumulation of non-performing carbon assets.Finally,an integrated approach is needed to address the disposal of non-performing assets in the carbon market.

朱兵强;周旭

湖南师范大学法学院,湖南 长沙 410081中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京 100088

政治法律

碳市场不良资产碳排放配额信用监管

carbon marketnon-performing assetscarbon emission quotascredit supervision

《中国人口·资源与环境》 2024 (002)

46-57 / 12

国家社会科学基金重大项目"新时代生态文明建设目标评价考核制度优化研究"(批准号:22&ZD138);司法部中青年项目"政府信用惩戒的行政法规制研究"(批准号:SFB183004);教育部青年基金项目"腐败的信用惩戒法律制度研究"(批准号:19YJC820080);北京市法学会2023年研究课题"数字背景下检察公益诉讼发展路径研究"(批准号:BLS(2023)B005).

10.12062/cpre.20230910

评论