|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国医学科学院学报|强化胰岛素治疗对急性心肌梗死患者的预后影响

强化胰岛素治疗对急性心肌梗死患者的预后影响OA北大核心CSTPCDMEDLINE

Effect of Intensive Insulin Therapy on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 系统评价强化胰岛素治疗应用于急性心肌梗死患者的临床疗效和安全性,为改善预后提供参考.方法 对Cochrane、Embase、PubMed、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、中文科技期刊数据库、CBM数据库自建库至2022 年10月的相关文献进行系统检索,以确定比较强化胰岛素治疗和普通胰岛素治疗对急性心肌梗死患者的临床预后影响的随机对照试验.提取每项研究的数据和特征,采用RevMan 5.4 软件进行荟萃分析.结果 最终纳入8 篇文献,共包含726 例患者,其中强化胰岛素治疗组372 例、普通胰岛素治疗组354 例.对各组数据进行荟萃分析显示,强化胰岛素治疗组主要心血管不良事件发生率(RR =0.53,95%CI =0.44~0.64,P<0.001)、全因死亡率(RR =0.51,95%CI =0.33~0.78,P =0.002)、治疗7d超敏C反应蛋白(WMD=-2.00,95%CI =-2.17~-1.83,P<0.001)均显著低于普通胰岛素治疗组,治疗30d左心室射血分数(WMD=3.94,95%CI=2.45~5.43,P<0.001)、低血糖事件发生率(RR=2.96,95%CI=1.12~7.83,P =0.030)均显著高于普通胰岛素治疗组,两组经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后无复流事件差异无统计学意义(RR =0.39,95%CI=0.14~1.13,P =0.080).结论 强化胰岛素治疗可能与急性心肌梗死患者的临床获益相关,但需要更多研究来证实.

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intensive insulin therapy in the pa-tients with acute myocardial infarction and provide guidance for improving the prognosis.Methods The articles involving the randomized controlled trials(RCT)focusing on the effects of intensive versus conventional insulin therapy on the clinical outcomes of the patients with acute myocardial infarction were retrieved from Cochrane,Embase,PubMed,CNKI,Wanfang Data,VIP,and CBM with the time interval from inception to October 2022.The data of each RCT were extracted and used for meta-analysis in RevMan5.4.Results A total of 8 arti-cles were included in this study,involving 726 patients(372 in the intensive insulin group and 354 in the nor-mal insulin group).The meta-analysis results showed that the intensive insulin group had lower incidence of major cardiovascular adverse events(RR =0.53,95%CI =0.44-0.64,P<0.001),lower all-cause mortality(RR = 0.51,95%CI =0.33-0.78,P =0.002),lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level on day 7(WMD =-2.00,95%CI =-2.17--1.83,P<0.001),higher left ventricular ejection fraction on day 30(WMD = 3.94,95%CI =2.45-5.43,P<0.001),and higher incidence of hypoglycemia events(RR =2.96,95%CI =1.12-7.83,P =0.030)than the normal insulin group.There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of no-reflow event after percutaneous coronary intervention(RR =0.39,95%CI =0.14-1.13,P =0.080).Conclusion Intensive insulin therapy might be associated with more clinical benefits in the patients with acute myocardial infarction,while the conclusion remains to be confirmed by more studies.

刘慧箬;杨泽禹;陆大洲;徐峰;陈玉国;李传保

山东大学齐鲁医院急诊科, 济南 250012||山东省急危重症临床医学研究中心, 济南 250012||山东省急危重症医学重点实验室, 济南 250012||山东大学齐鲁医院胸痛中心, 济南 250012

临床医学

急性心肌梗死强化胰岛素治疗荟萃分析

acute myocardial infarctionintensive insulin therapymeta-analysis

《中国医学科学院学报》 2024 (002)

176-183 / 8

国家自然科学基金(82070388)、泰山学者青年专家建设工程专项(tsqn202211310)和中华国际医学交流基金会项目(Z-2016-23-2101-11)

10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15772

评论